Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 17/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Muse Wonder leads Qwen3.6-27B by 24.6 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 32.4. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Muse Wonder scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Muse Wonder scores higher on StealthMark and runs 6× faster in our speed test. Qwen3.6-27B is 5.6× cheaper per output token. Both take about 1M tokens of context.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceMuse Wonder ↗Qwen3.6-27B ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Muse Wonder
The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.
Qwen3.6-27B
The artwork depicts a shaded sphere, distinct paint colors and a separate airborne black blob. Crimson's apex overlap does not establish its earlier interaction and transport, while cyan's recent contact remains unsupported. Horizontal centering supplies limited camera agreement, but the sphere, black blob and prominent panel have substantial placement or projection departures. A few planar echoes provide reflection evidence; isolated patches and gradients replace most of the required mirror structure.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Qwen3.6-27B |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 22.0/25 | 5.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 12.0/15 | 5.0/15 |
| Reflections | 21.5/120 | 8.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 7.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Muse Wonder
An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.
Qwen3.6-27B
An appealing decorative illustration with coordinated ornament, flowing panels and three glowing orbital lights. The arm arrangement reverses the requested sides. Uncertain neck continuity, concealed leg articulation, simplified paws, crowded chest jewelry and shallow surface modeling limit pose clarity and finish.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Qwen3.6-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 7.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 7.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
Muse Wonder
A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.
Qwen3.6-27B
A floating capybara in ornate robes tests character anatomy, layered fabric and the placement of surrounding luminous forms.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Muse Wonder
A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.
Qwen3.6-27B
The portrait loosely evokes Mona Lisa through its palette and silhouette. Readable pupils, brows and lips provide limited detail, and the torso remains continuous. The frontal elongated face, unresolved chest-level limb forms, shallow landscape and pervasive blur substantially weaken likeness, anatomy and finish.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Qwen3.6-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 5.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Muse Wonder
A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.
Qwen3.6-27B
A recognizable sunset beach with balanced palms, clean shapes and effective warm–cool contrast. Small animals and play equipment address the brief, but rudimentary anatomy, uncertain water contacts, sparse reflections and flat materials keep the drawing basic or uneven.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Qwen3.6-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 9.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 7.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Muse Wonder
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Qwen3.6-27B
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Muse Wonder
An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.
Qwen3.6-27B
A readable cartoon with balanced colors, clean shapes and a clearly supported raccoon. Continuous body construction and modest shading deserve credit. Rudimentary limbs, unresolved steering connections, stiff gestures and schematic water effects limit physical credibility and finish.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Qwen3.6-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 7.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 7.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Muse Wonder
A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.
Qwen3.6-27B
A lively, coherent illustration with recognizable pelican features, purposeful accessories and useful surface variation. Ambiguous neck layering, uncertain pedal engagement and an unresolved drivetrain limit construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement, while inconsistent shadow direction and crowded overlaps constrain finish.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Qwen3.6-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 8.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 7.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.