Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 17/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Muse Wonder leads Qwen3.5-9B by 46.5 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 10.5. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Muse Wonder scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Muse Wonder scores higher on StealthMark and runs 3.5× faster in our speed test. Qwen3.5-9B is 80× cheaper per output token. Both take about 1M tokens of context.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceMuse Wonder ↗Qwen3.5-9B ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Muse Wonder
The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.
Qwen3.5-9B
Horizontal centering and a separate airborne black blob are visible. Cyan's recent contact and crimson's forward transport are insufficiently demonstrated, while sphere support remains obscured. The enlarged, lowered sphere substantially changes the composition. The wall and floor sphere images, recursive room structure and curved emitter mappings are almost entirely missing.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 22.0/25 | 3.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 12.0/15 | 4.5/15 |
| Reflections | 21.5/120 | 2.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 7.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Muse Wonder
An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.
Qwen3.5-9B
Glowing teal spheres and a harmonious palette provide visible strengths, but the central character remains seriously unresolved. A large gap separates head and torso, limbs cannot be traced, and scattered garment shapes fail to establish the ornate costume. The foreground mound replaces the tall enclosing arch. Clean primitive edges do not repair these construction failures.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 7.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 7.5/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.5/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
Muse Wonder
A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.
Qwen3.5-9B
A floating capybara in ornate robes tests character anatomy, layered fabric and the placement of surrounding luminous forms.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Muse Wonder
A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.
Qwen3.5-9B
A centered dark oval with sparse facial marks forms a simple graphic face, but scarcely replicates the Mona Lisa. The portrait's body, crossed hands, clothing and landscape are missing, while angular facial construction and flat tones lose its likeness, volume and subtle expression.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 5.5/10 | 0.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.5/10 | 0.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.5/10 | 0.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.5/10 | 0.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 0.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.5/10 | 0.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.5/10 | 0.5/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Muse Wonder
A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.
Qwen3.5-9B
The beach is recognizable, and sweeping shoreline curves provide basic rhythm. Wildlife and playful activity remain poorly resolved, with ambiguous body construction and object contact. The sun glows without corresponding reflections or surface lighting. Fragmented subjects and an unintegrated rectangular panel substantially weaken composition and finish.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.0/10 | 0.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.5/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.5/10 | 1.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 9.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 7.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.0/10 | 0.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Muse Wonder
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Qwen3.5-9B
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Muse Wonder
An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.
Qwen3.5-9B
Bright colors, clean individual shapes and basic animal cues make the scene partly recognizable. Back seating, body continuity, steering and jet ski construction remain unresolved. Background gradients and wave rhythm provide some finish, but substantial anatomical, spatial and interaction weaknesses dominate.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.5/10 | 1.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.5/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.5/10 | 1.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 7.5/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.5/10 | 1.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 7.0/10 | 1.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Muse Wonder
A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.
Qwen3.5-9B
The oversized bill and orderly spoked wheels make the subject partly recognizable. Clean contours and strong color contrast provide graphic clarity, but unresolved appendages, steering, drivetrain and support dominate the construction. Sparse shading and detail further limit the illustration.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.5/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 8.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 7.5/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.