STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

MISSINGNO. vs Qwen3.6 27b

MISSINGNO. scores 5.7 points higher overall (38.0 vs 32.3). MISSINGNO. leads General Intelligence; Qwen3.6 27b leads Visual Intelligence. MISSINGNO. scores higher on Ground Truth.

See the difference ↘
Model guide ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

38.0/100
32.3/100

General Intelligence

33.6/100
21.8/100

Visual Intelligence

43.3/100
44.7/100

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

MISSINGNO.24.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The centered sphere, separate airborne black blob and cyan-above-crimson ordering provide limited valid structure. The colored beads do not establish the required impact and transport histories. One dim floor image supports a small part of the optical system, while the defining wall repetitions, nested sphere imagery and emitter mappings are missing. Rounded volume and some gloss earn material credit, tempered by soft surface appearance and excessive paint-bead scale.

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Qwen3.6 27b17.0/100

Qwen3.6 27b: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The artwork depicts a shaded sphere, distinct paint colors and a separate airborne black blob. Crimson's apex overlap does not establish its earlier interaction and transport, while cyan's recent contact remains unsupported. Horizontal centering supplies limited camera agreement, but the sphere, black blob and prominent panel have substantial placement or projection departures. A few planar echoes provide reflection evidence; isolated patches and gradients replace most of the required mirror structure.

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Compare category scores
CategoryMISSINGNO.Qwen3.6 27b
State at 600 ms11.5/258.0/25
Camera and placement7.0/155.0/15
Reflections12.0/1208.0/120
Materials and scale5.5/104.0/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Selfie

Different task instructions

MISSINGNO.49.7/100

MISSINGNO.: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

An appealing purple character with a readable pleased expression and raised-moustache joke. Smooth shading and clean contours support the simple design, but indistinct mitten grips, minimally textured curls and an uncompressed strap weaken the requested physical interaction. The jelly suggests gloss more convincingly than translucency.

Benchmark task

A glossy purple jelly struggles with an oversized fake moustache at a playful checkpoint. The scene tests comic expression, physical contact and the appearance of a soft translucent body.

Qwen3.6 27b56.8/100

Qwen3.6 27b: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

An appealing decorative illustration with coordinated ornament, flowing panels and three glowing orbital lights. The arm arrangement reverses the requested sides. Uncertain neck continuity, concealed leg articulation, simplified paws, crowded chest jewelry and shallow surface modeling limit pose clarity and finish.

Benchmark task

A floating capybara in ornate robes tests character anatomy, layered fabric and the placement of surrounding luminous forms.

Compare category scores
CategoryMISSINGNO.Qwen3.6 27b
Task & likeness5.5/106.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/105.0/10
Space & placement6.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections5.5/105.5/10
Purposeful detail4.5/106.0/10
Artistry & character4.5/105.0/10
Materials & effects4.0/105.0/10
Visual integrity6.0/107.0/10

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

MISSINGNO.28.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

Clean contours, connected body forms and gentle gradients support a basic, coherent portrait. Likeness remains weak: the face dominates the body, the seated angle is lost, and crossed hands become dark lobes without traceable wrists or fingers. Readable facial details add some drawing complexity, but clothing, landscape and material treatment remain sparse.

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Qwen3.6 27b30.8/100

Qwen3.6 27b: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The portrait loosely evokes Mona Lisa through its palette and silhouette. Readable pupils, brows and lips provide limited detail, and the torso remains continuous. The frontal elongated face, unresolved chest-level limb forms, shallow landscape and pervasive blur substantially weaken likeness, anatomy and finish.

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Compare category scores
CategoryMISSINGNO.Qwen3.6 27b
Task & likeness1.5/102.5/10
Anatomy & construction2.5/103.0/10
Space & placement2.5/104.0/10
Light & reflections3.0/104.0/10
Purposeful detail2.0/102.5/10
Artistry & character3.5/102.5/10
Materials & effects2.0/103.0/10
Visual integrity6.0/104.0/10

Beach

Different task instructions

MISSINGNO.43.9/100

MISSINGNO.: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent sunset beach with clear requested subjects, balanced framing and clean shapes. The aligned solar reflection and warm gradients establish atmosphere. Primitive animal construction, ambiguous furniture, sparse depth cues and minimally developed surfaces limit its drawing complexity and physical richness.

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Qwen3.6 27b56.7/100

Qwen3.6 27b: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A recognizable sunset beach with balanced palms, clean shapes and effective warm–cool contrast. Small animals and play equipment address the brief, but rudimentary anatomy, uncertain water contacts, sparse reflections and flat materials keep the drawing basic or uneven.

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Compare category scores
CategoryMISSINGNO.Qwen3.6 27b
Task & likeness7.0/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.0/105.0/10
Space & placement6.5/105.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail3.0/104.5/10
Artistry & character3.0/105.5/10
Materials & effects5.0/105.5/10
Visual integrity3.5/107.0/10

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

MISSINGNO.44.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Ground Truth SVG benchmark
Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Qwen3.6 27b23.7/100

Qwen3.6 27b: Ground Truth SVG benchmark
Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

MISSINGNO.57.5/100

MISSINGNO.: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The requested interaction reads clearly through recognizable animals, expressive faces and a coherent hull-water relationship. Clean curves and readable accessories give the cartoon polish. Partly unresolved grips and supporting contacts limit physical construction; modest shape complexity, weak directional lighting and schematic water constrain its finish.

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Qwen3.6 27b48.1/100

Qwen3.6 27b: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A readable cartoon with balanced colors, clean shapes and a clearly supported raccoon. Continuous body construction and modest shading deserve credit. Rudimentary limbs, unresolved steering connections, stiff gestures and schematic water effects limit physical credibility and finish.

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Compare category scores
CategoryMISSINGNO.Qwen3.6 27b
Task & likeness8.0/105.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.0/104.0/10
Space & placement5.5/106.0/10
Light & reflections5.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail6.0/105.5/10
Artistry & character5.0/105.5/10
Materials & effects4.5/105.5/10
Visual integrity7.0/102.5/10

Pelican

Different task instructions

MISSINGNO.58.8/100

MISSINGNO.: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent, cheerful illustration with recognizable pelican features, balanced composition, clean contours and useful small details. Its controlled curves and layered wheels demonstrate competent drawing skill. Ambiguous pedal and steering contacts, sparse drivetrain construction and weak directional lighting limit the riding mechanics and finish.

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.

Qwen3.6 27b58.5/100

Qwen3.6 27b: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A lively, coherent illustration with recognizable pelican features, purposeful accessories and useful surface variation. Ambiguous neck layering, uncertain pedal engagement and an unresolved drivetrain limit construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement, while inconsistent shadow direction and crowded overlaps constrain finish.

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.

Compare category scores
CategoryMISSINGNO.Qwen3.6 27b
Task & likeness7.0/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/104.0/10
Space & placement6.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/105.0/10
Purposeful detail5.5/106.5/10
Artistry & character6.0/105.5/10
Materials & effects4.5/106.5/10
Visual integrity6.5/106.5/10