STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

MISSINGNO. vs Qwen3.5 9B

MISSINGNO. scores 27.0 points higher overall (38.0 vs 11.0). MISSINGNO. scores higher on Ground Truth.

See the difference ↘
Model guide ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

38.0/100
11.0/100

General Intelligence

33.6/100
8.2/100

Visual Intelligence

43.3/100
14.3/100

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

MISSINGNO.24.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The centered sphere, separate airborne black blob and cyan-above-crimson ordering provide limited valid structure. The colored beads do not establish the required impact and transport histories. One dim floor image supports a small part of the optical system, while the defining wall repetitions, nested sphere imagery and emitter mappings are missing. Rounded volume and some gloss earn material credit, tempered by soft surface appearance and excessive paint-bead scale.

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Qwen3.5 9B10.9/100

Qwen3.5 9B: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

Horizontal centering and a separate airborne black blob are visible. Cyan's recent contact and crimson's forward transport are insufficiently demonstrated, while sphere support remains obscured. The enlarged, lowered sphere substantially changes the composition. The wall and floor sphere images, recursive room structure and curved emitter mappings are almost entirely missing.

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Compare category scores
CategoryMISSINGNO.Qwen3.5 9B
State at 600 ms11.5/255.5/25
Camera and placement7.0/154.5/15
Reflections12.0/1202.0/120
Materials and scale5.5/103.0/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Selfie

Different task instructions

MISSINGNO.49.7/100

MISSINGNO.: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

An appealing purple character with a readable pleased expression and raised-moustache joke. Smooth shading and clean contours support the simple design, but indistinct mitten grips, minimally textured curls and an uncompressed strap weaken the requested physical interaction. The jelly suggests gloss more convincingly than translucency.

Benchmark task

A glossy purple jelly struggles with an oversized fake moustache at a playful checkpoint. The scene tests comic expression, physical contact and the appearance of a soft translucent body.

Qwen3.5 9B25.8/100

Qwen3.5 9B: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

Glowing teal spheres and a harmonious palette provide visible strengths, but the central character remains seriously unresolved. A large gap separates head and torso, limbs cannot be traced, and scattered garment shapes fail to establish the ornate costume. The foreground mound replaces the tall enclosing arch. Clean primitive edges do not repair these construction failures.

Benchmark task

A floating capybara in ornate robes tests character anatomy, layered fabric and the placement of surrounding luminous forms.

Compare category scores
CategoryMISSINGNO.Qwen3.5 9B
Task & likeness5.5/103.0/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/102.0/10
Space & placement6.0/103.0/10
Light & reflections5.5/103.5/10
Purposeful detail4.5/102.0/10
Artistry & character4.5/102.0/10
Materials & effects4.0/104.0/10
Visual integrity6.0/103.0/10

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

MISSINGNO.28.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

Clean contours, connected body forms and gentle gradients support a basic, coherent portrait. Likeness remains weak: the face dominates the body, the seated angle is lost, and crossed hands become dark lobes without traceable wrists or fingers. Readable facial details add some drawing complexity, but clothing, landscape and material treatment remain sparse.

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Qwen3.5 9B1.2/100

Qwen3.5 9B: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A centered dark oval with sparse facial marks forms a simple graphic face, but scarcely replicates the Mona Lisa. The portrait's body, crossed hands, clothing and landscape are missing, while angular facial construction and flat tones lose its likeness, volume and subtle expression.

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Compare category scores
CategoryMISSINGNO.Qwen3.5 9B
Task & likeness1.5/100.0/10
Anatomy & construction2.5/100.0/10
Space & placement2.5/100.0/10
Light & reflections3.0/100.0/10
Purposeful detail2.0/100.0/10
Artistry & character3.5/100.5/10
Materials & effects2.0/100.0/10
Visual integrity6.0/100.5/10

Beach

Different task instructions

MISSINGNO.43.9/100

MISSINGNO.: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent sunset beach with clear requested subjects, balanced framing and clean shapes. The aligned solar reflection and warm gradients establish atmosphere. Primitive animal construction, ambiguous furniture, sparse depth cues and minimally developed surfaces limit its drawing complexity and physical richness.

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Qwen3.5 9B12.8/100

Qwen3.5 9B: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The beach is recognizable, and sweeping shoreline curves provide basic rhythm. Wildlife and playful activity remain poorly resolved, with ambiguous body construction and object contact. The sun glows without corresponding reflections or surface lighting. Fragmented subjects and an unintegrated rectangular panel substantially weaken composition and finish.

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Compare category scores
CategoryMISSINGNO.Qwen3.5 9B
Task & likeness7.0/101.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.0/100.5/10
Space & placement6.5/101.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/101.0/10
Purposeful detail3.0/102.5/10
Artistry & character3.0/101.5/10
Materials & effects5.0/100.5/10
Visual integrity3.5/101.5/10

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

MISSINGNO.44.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Ground Truth SVG benchmark
Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Qwen3.5 9B10.4/100

Qwen3.5 9B: Ground Truth SVG benchmark
Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

MISSINGNO.57.5/100

MISSINGNO.: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The requested interaction reads clearly through recognizable animals, expressive faces and a coherent hull-water relationship. Clean curves and readable accessories give the cartoon polish. Partly unresolved grips and supporting contacts limit physical construction; modest shape complexity, weak directional lighting and schematic water constrain its finish.

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Qwen3.5 9B14.7/100

Qwen3.5 9B: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

Bright colors, clean individual shapes and basic animal cues make the scene partly recognizable. Back seating, body continuity, steering and jet ski construction remain unresolved. Background gradients and wave rhythm provide some finish, but substantial anatomical, spatial and interaction weaknesses dominate.

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Compare category scores
CategoryMISSINGNO.Qwen3.5 9B
Task & likeness8.0/102.5/10
Anatomy & construction5.0/101.0/10
Space & placement5.5/102.0/10
Light & reflections5.0/101.0/10
Purposeful detail6.0/101.5/10
Artistry & character5.0/101.0/10
Materials & effects4.5/101.0/10
Visual integrity7.0/102.5/10

Pelican

Different task instructions

MISSINGNO.58.8/100

MISSINGNO.: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent, cheerful illustration with recognizable pelican features, balanced composition, clean contours and useful small details. Its controlled curves and layered wheels demonstrate competent drawing skill. Ambiguous pedal and steering contacts, sparse drivetrain construction and weak directional lighting limit the riding mechanics and finish.

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.

Qwen3.5 9B23.0/100

Qwen3.5 9B: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The oversized bill and orderly spoked wheels make the subject partly recognizable. Clean contours and strong color contrast provide graphic clarity, but unresolved appendages, steering, drivetrain and support dominate the construction. Sparse shading and detail further limit the illustration.

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.

Compare category scores
CategoryMISSINGNO.Qwen3.5 9B
Task & likeness7.0/104.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/101.5/10
Space & placement6.0/103.0/10
Light & reflections5.0/101.5/10
Purposeful detail5.5/102.5/10
Artistry & character6.0/101.5/10
Materials & effects4.5/101.5/10
Visual integrity6.5/102.5/10