STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

MISSINGNO. vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

MISSINGNO. scores 19.8 points higher overall (38.0 vs 18.2). MISSINGNO. scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
Model guide ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

38.0/100
18.2/100

General Intelligence

33.6/100
14.4/100

Visual Intelligence

43.3/100
25.7/100

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

MISSINGNO.24.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The centered sphere, separate airborne black blob and cyan-above-crimson ordering provide limited valid structure. The colored beads do not establish the required impact and transport histories. One dim floor image supports a small part of the optical system, while the defining wall repetitions, nested sphere imagery and emitter mappings are missing. Rounded volume and some gloss earn material credit, tempered by soft surface appearance and excessive paint-bead scale.

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Nemotron 3 Ultra13.3/100

Nemotron 3 Ultra: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The candidate establishes a separate airborne black blob and partial crimson overlap, but leaves the paint interaction history and settled support unresolved. Its main silhouette, black placement and lamp projection depart substantially from the required camera geometry. A few faint reflection hints provide little support for the extensive mirror system, while the compact paint volumes are visibly disproportionate.

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Compare category scores
CategoryMISSINGNO.Nemotron 3 Ultra
State at 600 ms11.5/257.0/25
Camera and placement7.0/153.5/15
Reflections12.0/1206.5/120
Materials and scale5.5/103.0/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Selfie

Different task instructions

MISSINGNO.49.7/100

MISSINGNO.: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

An appealing purple character with a readable pleased expression and raised-moustache joke. Smooth shading and clean contours support the simple design, but indistinct mitten grips, minimally textured curls and an uncompressed strap weaken the requested physical interaction. The jelly suggests gloss more convincingly than translucency.

Benchmark task

A glossy purple jelly struggles with an oversized fake moustache at a playful checkpoint. The scene tests comic expression, physical contact and the appearance of a soft translucent body.

Nemotron 3 Ultra36.2/100

Nemotron 3 Ultra: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

An endearing mechanical creature is clearly framed, with expressive amber eyes and readable segmented arms. The shell resembles layered green plates more than a deep coiled spiral. Detached-looking construction, absent working contacts and patchy rendering leave the central assembly action substantially unresolved.

Benchmark task

A hovering mechanical nautilus tests spiral construction, connected mechanical forms and contrasting metal and illuminated surfaces.

Compare category scores
CategoryMISSINGNO.Nemotron 3 Ultra
Task & likeness5.5/104.0/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/104.0/10
Space & placement6.0/105.5/10
Light & reflections5.5/105.0/10
Purposeful detail4.5/104.0/10
Artistry & character4.5/103.0/10
Materials & effects4.0/104.0/10
Visual integrity6.0/104.5/10

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

MISSINGNO.28.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

Clean contours, connected body forms and gentle gradients support a basic, coherent portrait. Likeness remains weak: the face dominates the body, the seated angle is lost, and crossed hands become dark lobes without traceable wrists or fingers. Readable facial details add some drawing complexity, but clothing, landscape and material treatment remain sparse.

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Nemotron 3 Ultra0.5/100

Nemotron 3 Ultra: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The centered silhouette provides basic organization, but multicolored mottling and geometric overlays leave the portrait unresolved. No readable face, crossed hands, clothing or landscape establishes Mona Lisa replication. Texture and transparency offer limited visual effects without coherent anatomy, lighting or material distinctions.

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Compare category scores
CategoryMISSINGNO.Nemotron 3 Ultra
Task & likeness1.5/100.5/10
Anatomy & construction2.5/100.0/10
Space & placement2.5/101.0/10
Light & reflections3.0/100.5/10
Purposeful detail2.0/100.5/10
Artistry & character3.5/101.5/10
Materials & effects2.0/100.0/10
Visual integrity6.0/100.5/10

Beach

Different task instructions

MISSINGNO.43.9/100

MISSINGNO.: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent sunset beach with clear requested subjects, balanced framing and clean shapes. The aligned solar reflection and warm gradients establish atmosphere. Primitive animal construction, ambiguous furniture, sparse depth cues and minimally developed surfaces limit its drawing complexity and physical richness.

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Nemotron 3 Ultra39.0/100

Nemotron 3 Ultra: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A recognizable beach illustration with appealing warm-cool contrast, readable layers and mostly clean shapes. Unresolved seat construction, schematic animals and broad geometric foliage give it an elementary finish. Weakly coordinated reflections and limited material differentiation further constrain depth and atmosphere.

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Compare category scores
CategoryMISSINGNO.Nemotron 3 Ultra
Task & likeness7.0/106.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.0/103.0/10
Space & placement6.5/105.0/10
Light & reflections5.0/101.5/10
Purposeful detail3.0/104.5/10
Artistry & character3.0/103.0/10
Materials & effects5.0/102.5/10
Visual integrity3.5/106.5/10

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

MISSINGNO.44.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Ground Truth SVG benchmark
Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Nemotron 3 Ultra17.8/100

Nemotron 3 Ultra: Ground Truth SVG benchmark
Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

MISSINGNO.57.5/100

MISSINGNO.: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The requested interaction reads clearly through recognizable animals, expressive faces and a coherent hull-water relationship. Clean curves and readable accessories give the cartoon polish. Partly unresolved grips and supporting contacts limit physical construction; modest shape complexity, weak directional lighting and schematic water constrain its finish.

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Nemotron 3 Ultra24.3/100

Nemotron 3 Ultra: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The masked raccoon, dog and orange craft make the scene recognizable, with an appealing sunset palette. Overlapping bodies obscure the riding relationship, and the dog's connection to the controls remains unresolved. Weak water displacement, inconsistent shading and visible shape artifacts limit the finish. Ambiguous attachments do not establish detached limbs or inverted anatomy.

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Compare category scores
CategoryMISSINGNO.Nemotron 3 Ultra
Task & likeness8.0/103.5/10
Anatomy & construction5.0/101.5/10
Space & placement5.5/104.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/102.0/10
Purposeful detail6.0/103.5/10
Artistry & character5.0/101.5/10
Materials & effects4.5/103.0/10
Visual integrity7.0/102.5/10

Pelican

Different task instructions

MISSINGNO.58.8/100

MISSINGNO.: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent, cheerful illustration with recognizable pelican features, balanced composition, clean contours and useful small details. Its controlled curves and layered wheels demonstrate competent drawing skill. Ambiguous pedal and steering contacts, sparse drivetrain construction and weak directional lighting limit the riding mechanics and finish.

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.

Nemotron 3 Ultra34.8/100

Nemotron 3 Ultra: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A recognizable, playful pelican dominates a readable bicycle scene. Its bill and silhouette succeed, but feet below the pedals and confused drivetrain connections weaken the riding action. Local material modeling adds interest; overlapping contours, repetitive detail and inconsistent shadows leave the illustration basic and uneven.

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.

Compare category scores
CategoryMISSINGNO.Nemotron 3 Ultra
Task & likeness7.0/104.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/103.5/10
Space & placement6.0/103.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/104.0/10
Purposeful detail5.5/105.5/10
Artistry & character6.0/104.0/10
Materials & effects4.5/106.0/10
Visual integrity6.5/103.0/10