STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

MiniMax M3 vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads MiniMax M3 by 22.4 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 34.6. It leads on 8 of 9 benchmarks, including both games, and MiniMax M3 on 1. Muse Wonder scores higher on Ground Truth.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

34.6/100Overall rank 39/53
57.0/100Overall rank 10/53

General Intelligence

28.0/100
53.1/100

Visual Intelligence

45.3/100
64.0/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

  • MiniMax M3

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • MiniMax M3
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

MiniMax M3 is 17× cheaper per output token. Muse Wonder scores higher on StealthMark and runs 3.5× faster in our speed test. Both take about 1M tokens of context.

  • MiniMax M3
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
MiniMax M3: $1.2017× cheaper$0.30 inputMuse Wonder: $20$4 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
MiniMax M3: 1MTied512K max outputMuse Wonder: 1MTied
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
MiniMax M3: 162tokens/sMuse Wonder: 5703.5× fastertokens/s
SizeTotal and active parameters
MiniMax M3: 428B23B activeMuse Wonder: Not disclosed
Developer
MiniMaxMeta
Released
1 Jun 202612 Oct 2026
Origin
SingaporeUnited States
Input → output
Text, image, video → textText, image, video, audio, PDF → text
Architecture
Mixture-of-Experts with MiniMax Sparse Attention and native multimodal encoderNot published

Full datasheets, every price and sourceMiniMax M3 ↗Muse Wonder ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

MiniMax M3 22.1/100Rank 38/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 36 ptsTurn 7 / 20

Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 17/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 311 ptsTurn 17 / 20

Points per level

LevelMiniMax M3Muse Wonder
Level 1Second Thoughts
17 ptsOut of lives
16 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
3 ptsOut of lives
10 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
6 ptsOut of lives
11 ptsOut of lives

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

MiniMax M3 31.4/100Rank 34/48

Cleared 2 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 58.8 ptsTurn 11 / 40

Muse Wonder 67.0/100Rank 17/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Points per level

LevelMiniMax M3Muse Wonder
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
9.4 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
9 ptsCleared
Level 3Relay vault
0.2 ptsFinished early
18.8 ptsCleared
Level 4Passing bay
14.2 ptsFinished early
17.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
Level 5Second thoughts
8.8 ptsFinished early
20.6 ptsCleared

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

MiniMax M3

The centered sphere, aligned left wall image, smaller lower-left continuation and partially occluded floor image provide recognizable local mirror coherence. Cyan remains airborne, the main sphere resembles white marble, and missing right-side imagery, recursive optics and panel mappings leave the scene substantially incomplete.

Muse Wonder

The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.

Score breakdown

CategoryMiniMax M3Muse Wonder
State at 600 ms7.0/2522.0/25
Camera and placement14.5/1512.0/15
Reflections22.0/12021.5/120
Materials and scale5.0/107.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

MiniMax M3

The oversized coral M silhouette dominates clearly, with an expressive charcoal face and appealing miniature body. Limbs connect coherently and the cube reads clearly. The lowered left hand only loosely suggests the requested hip pose. Thin highlights and simple gradients provide limited sculptural volume; the cube's glow and grounding shadow are restrained.

Muse Wonder

An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.

Score breakdown

CategoryMiniMax M3Muse Wonder
Task & likeness8.0/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.0/107.0/10
Space & placement7.0/107.5/10
Light & reflections6.0/107.0/10
Purposeful detail4.0/107.5/10
Artistry & character4.0/106.5/10
Materials & effects4.0/106.5/10
Visual integrity8.0/108.0/10

Benchmark task

MiniMax M3

A small robot with an oversized angular head presents a glowing object. The scene tests character proportions, gesture and contrasting materials.

Muse Wonder

A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

MiniMax M3

The centered portrait, dark hair and muted palette suggest Mona Lisa, but characteristic likeness and pose are poorly reproduced. The broad oval face lacks her subtle smile; rounded shoulders and a lone mittenlike hand leave the crossed-arm construction unresolved. Warm shading supplies some volume, while blurred landscape bands, generic clothing and indistinct features limit the drawing.

Muse Wonder

A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.

Score breakdown

CategoryMiniMax M3Muse Wonder
Task & likeness2.5/105.5/10
Anatomy & construction1.5/105.5/10
Space & placement2.5/105.5/10
Light & reflections3.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail1.5/105.5/10
Artistry & character1.5/105.5/10
Materials & effects2.0/105.0/10
Visual integrity2.0/106.5/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Different task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

MiniMax M3

A cheerful, coherent sunset illustration with framing palms, warm gradients and an aligned sun reflection. Animals and beach toys add character, but their construction remains basic. The sailboat appears suspended above the water horizon, while absent cast shadows weaken foreground contact. Clean geometric shapes provide polish without substantial texture or depth.

Muse Wonder

A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.

Score breakdown

CategoryMiniMax M3Muse Wonder
Task & likeness8.0/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/106.0/10
Space & placement6.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections7.0/106.5/10
Purposeful detail6.0/109.0/10
Artistry & character5.0/107.0/10
Materials & effects5.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity5.5/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

MiniMax M3

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Muse Wonder

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

MiniMax M3

The raccoon sits above the dog's back, and the dog reaches toward the jet ski controls. Expressive faces and a vivid sunset make the scene appealing. Construction is simplified: the dog's paws and steering grip are ambiguous, the hull is shallow, and blurred wake patches give limited water displacement. Sunset glow exceeds the lighting modeled on the riders.

Muse Wonder

An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.

Score breakdown

CategoryMiniMax M3Muse Wonder
Task & likeness8.0/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/105.5/10
Space & placement6.5/106.5/10
Light & reflections6.0/104.5/10
Purposeful detail7.0/107.5/10
Artistry & character6.0/105.5/10
Materials & effects6.0/107.0/10
Visual integrity7.0/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Different task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

MiniMax M3

The pelican's long bill, pouch and curved neck read clearly, and the warm sunset gives the composition appeal. Bicycle construction weakens the riding action: feet do not convincingly engage the pedals, crank connections are unclear, and body support is unresolved. Clean silhouettes and orderly spokes provide a competent illustrative finish.

Muse Wonder

A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryMiniMax M3Muse Wonder
Task & likeness8.0/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/106.0/10
Space & placement6.5/107.5/10
Light & reflections6.5/105.5/10
Purposeful detail7.5/108.5/10
Artistry & character6.5/107.5/10
Materials & effects6.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity6.5/108.0/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.