MiMo-V2.6-Pro 54.6/100Rank 13/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Qwen3.8-Max-0902 leads MiMo-V2.6-Pro by 15.4 points on StealthMark, 63.3 to 47.9. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Qwen3.8-Max-0902 scores higher on Ground Truth.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 5.7× cheaper per output token and runs 1.5× faster in our speed test. Qwen3.8-Max-0902 scores higher on StealthMark. Both take about 1M tokens of context.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceMiMo-V2.6-Pro ↗Qwen3.8-Max-0902 ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
The main framing and visible paint-contact story are well supported. Major optical omissions dominate the result: sparse repetitions, undersized first images, missing outer chains and absent curved nested imagery prevent a coherent mirror-room system. The metallic forms remain convincing in volume but have a soft illustrative finish.
Qwen3.8-Max-0902
The central sphere and differentiated cyan/crimson interaction are supported. The tiny highlighted object above the sphere provides partial airborne-black evidence. The few isolated sphere and panel images preserve limited optical relationships, but most of the repeating mirror-room structure is missing. Core score: 64.5/170; including the floor-damage reward: 64.5/180.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.8-Max-0902 |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 23.0/25 | 23.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 12.0/15 | 12.0/15 |
| Reflections | 19.0/120 | 29.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 7.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
An appealing rabbit with balanced framing, expressive eyes and purposeful costume accents. Simple frontal construction limits anatomical and spatial accomplishment. The orange orb provides an effective luminous focal point, but unreadable wrist connections weaken the requested gestures and prevent stronger integrity credit.
Qwen3.8-Max-0902
A coherent ornamental illustration with balanced framing, appealing color and legible magical accessories. The disconnected raised wrist, incorrect raised-arm side and palm orientation, bear-like facial proportions and shallow material modeling limit execution. Clean decoration and compact spatial balance remain strengths.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.8-Max-0902 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
A small rabbit in an explorer outfit floats with a luminous orb. The scene tests character anatomy, pose and the placement of geometric forms around it.
Qwen3.8-Max-0902
A floating capybara in ornate robes tests character anatomy, layered fabric and the placement of surrounding luminous forms.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
The portrait is recognizable through its dark silhouette, slight smile and muted landscape, but replication is weak. A frontal, oversized head and symmetric torso replace the reference's turned seated pose; angular, separated hands omit its central gesture. Smooth shading maintains coherence while anatomical detail, depth and material rendering remain basic.
Qwen3.8-Max-0902
A recognizable, cohesive Mona Lisa interpretation with readable landscape layers and a restrained expression. Continuous body construction and clean contours support readability, but broad hands, simplified drapery, frontal symmetry and limited facial volume keep the execution basic and uneven.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.8-Max-0902 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 3.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
A readable sunset beach with clear requested subjects, appealing framing and purposeful accessories. Schematic anatomy, flattened foreground objects, repetitive water highlights and sparse directional shadows limit construction and physical depth. The kite's unresolved anchor also constrains integrity.
Qwen3.8-Max-0902
A strong stylized beach illustration with coherent sunset color, lively dolphin arcs and balanced activity. Clean contours, readable ground contact and an aligned reflection support the finish. Schematic anatomy, sparse small-subject features, flat materials and repetitive water highlights limit physical depth and refinement.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.8-Max-0902 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Qwen3.8-Max-0902
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
A coherent, cheerful cartoon with recognizable animals, readable steering contact and useful small details. The dog's orientation follows the craft more successfully than a wholly frontal pose would. Simple anatomy, weak raccoon grip and compressed seating contacts still limit physical credibility. Gradients and spray provide polish without resolving complex construction.
Qwen3.8-Max-0902
The riding arrangement and steering action are readable, supported by coherent visible attachments and useful character details. Clean shapes, strong color separation and clustered foam make the scene appealing and active. Stiff anatomy, crowded controls, limited directional lighting and simple surface treatments constrain sophistication.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.8-Max-0902 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 4.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
The distinctive bill, continuous silhouette and detailed wheels establish a readable pelican cyclist. Shaped feathers and soft shading add character, but jointless legs, crowded pedal contacts, absent steering contact and loosely directional lighting limit the construction. The comparisons support retaining the baseline category scores.
Qwen3.8-Max-0902
An appealing graphic illustration with a recognizable pelican, readable bicycle and clean coastal composition. Steering contact and one connected pedal support the action. Ambiguous neck-to-torso construction, an unclear opposing pedal connection, shallow space and limited material and lighting effects constrain its execution.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.8-Max-0902 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.