MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.8-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

The main framing and visible paint-contact story are well supported. Major optical omissions dominate the result: sparse repetitions, undersized first images, missing outer chains and absent curved nested imagery prevent a coherent mirror-room system. The metallic forms remain convincing in volume but have a soft illustrative finish.

Qwen3.8-Flash

The full-frame illustration supports a central steel sphere, an airborne black blob and the relative ordering of cyan and crimson. Its faint floor return and symmetric repetitions provide sparse mirror structure; outer chains, large reflected images, nested imagery and emitter mapping remain deficient. Vertical framing is substantially displaced, and paint contact histories remain unresolved.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

An appealing rabbit with balanced framing, expressive eyes and purposeful costume accents. Simple frontal construction limits anatomical and spatial accomplishment. The orange orb provides an effective luminous focal point, but unreadable wrist connections weaken the requested gestures and prevent stronger integrity credit.

Qwen3.8-Flash

A coherent, appealing fantasy illustration with disciplined framing, luminous teal accents and consistent ornament. Most requested elements are clearly present. The bear-like facial proportions, lowered resting hand, obscured bent-leg construction and limited fabric modeling constrain likeness and anatomical clarity; glow effects are attractive but weakly integrated with surrounding surfaces.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

A small rabbit in an explorer outfit floats with a luminous orb. The scene tests character anatomy, pose and the placement of geometric forms around it.

Qwen3.8-Flash

A floating capybara in ornate robes tests character anatomy, layered fabric and the placement of surrounding luminous forms.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

The portrait is recognizable through its dark silhouette, slight smile and muted landscape, but replication is weak. A frontal, oversized head and symmetric torso replace the reference's turned seated pose; angular, separated hands omit its central gesture. Smooth shading maintains coherence while anatomical detail, depth and material rendering remain basic.

Qwen3.8-Flash

The dark dress, crossed hands and hazy landscape evoke the Mona Lisa, but replication is limited by a generic frontal face, coarse smile and poorly articulated fingers. The gold frame has clearer definition than the portrait. Heavy mottling obscures features, while soft shading provides some volume without convincing anatomical detail.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

A readable sunset beach with clear requested subjects, appealing framing and purposeful accessories. Schematic anatomy, flattened foreground objects, repetitive water highlights and sparse directional shadows limit construction and physical depth. The kite's unresolved anchor also constrains integrity.

Qwen3.8-Flash

Sweeping palms, coordinated sunset colors and a central reflection create an expressive beach composition with clear depth. Birds, animals and varied activities thoroughly realize the brief. Small figures and animal anatomy remain rudimentary, water movement is schematic, and contact shadows are weak. Scattered foreground details and the clipped orange disk limit the finish.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Qwen3.8-Flash

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

A coherent, cheerful cartoon with recognizable animals, readable steering contact and useful small details. The dog's orientation follows the craft more successfully than a wholly frontal pose would. Simple anatomy, weak raccoon grip and compressed seating contacts still limit physical credibility. Gradients and spray provide polish without resolving complex construction.

Qwen3.8-Flash

The raccoon clearly rides the dog's back, with expressive features and appealing blue-orange color contrast. The dog's paws do not clearly operate connected controls, and the shallow vehicle lacks convincing jet ski construction. Clean outlines support the cartoon style, but generic shading and blurred water streaks limit depth and motion.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

The distinctive bill, continuous silhouette and detailed wheels establish a readable pelican cyclist. Shaped feathers and soft shading add character, but jointless legs, crowded pedal contacts, absent steering contact and loosely directional lighting limit the construction. The comparisons support retaining the baseline category scores.

Qwen3.8-Flash

The pelican's expressive face, oversized bill and flowing scarf create an appealing focal point. The bicycle has recognizable frame, chain and wheel construction, but the far foot lacks a clear pedal connection and the wing's steering contact is ambiguous. Clean contours and gentle gradients support the illustration; simplified volume and weak directional shadows limit depth.