MiMo-V2.6-Pro 54.6/100Rank 13/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Qwen3.8-27B leads MiMo-V2.6-Pro by 3.8 points on StealthMark, 51.7 to 47.9. It leads on 7 of 9 benchmarks, including Foresight, and MiMo-V2.6-Pro on 2, including Latch. Qwen3.8-27B scores higher on Raccoon, with its largest category advantage in artistry & character.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 1.9× cheaper per output token and runs 47% faster in our speed test. Qwen3.8-27B scores higher on StealthMark. Both take about 1M tokens of context.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceMiMo-V2.6-Pro ↗Qwen3.8-27B ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
The main framing and visible paint-contact story are well supported. Major optical omissions dominate the result: sparse repetitions, undersized first images, missing outer chains and absent curved nested imagery prevent a coherent mirror-room system. The metallic forms remain convincing in volume but have a soft illustrative finish.
Qwen3.8-27B
The room fills the complete 16:9 frame without visible borders or labels. Central placement fits the wider frame, and the paint colors follow the expected vertical order. Bilateral side images, diminishing echoes and an overlapping floor image provide limited mirror depth. Broad sphere surfaces lack ordered nested room imagery, while planar panel sequences and outer chains remain missing or unresolved. Soft highlights do not establish emitter mapping, while paint attachment and transport history are only partly supported.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.8-27B |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 23.0/25 | 23.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 12.0/15 | 13.0/15 |
| Reflections | 19.0/120 | 24.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 7.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
An appealing rabbit with balanced framing, expressive eyes and purposeful costume accents. Simple frontal construction limits anatomical and spatial accomplishment. The orange orb provides an effective luminous focal point, but unreadable wrist connections weaken the requested gestures and prevent stronger integrity credit.
Qwen3.8-27B
A cohesive emerald-and-gold illustration with a gentle expression, flowing robes, luminous halo and three clearly ringed orbs. Limbs remain connected, and the asymmetric legs communicate floating. The rounded face reads somewhat bear-like; the raised palm faces outward rather than upward, and chest-hand fingers are crowded. Clean ornamentation exceeds the comparatively simple anatomical modeling and shading.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.8-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
A small rabbit in an explorer outfit floats with a luminous orb. The scene tests character anatomy, pose and the placement of geometric forms around it.
Qwen3.8-27B
A floating capybara in ornate robes tests character anatomy, layered fabric and the placement of surrounding luminous forms.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
The portrait is recognizable through its dark silhouette, slight smile and muted landscape, but replication is weak. A frontal, oversized head and symmetric torso replace the reference's turned seated pose; angular, separated hands omit its central gesture. Smooth shading maintains coherence while anatomical detail, depth and material rendering remain basic.
Qwen3.8-27B
The centered portrait, dark clothing and overlapping hands evoke the Mona Lisa, but replication is weak. The face is excessively elongated, the eyes stare broadly, and the hands reduce to rounded masses with shallow finger marks. Soft shading creates some volume, while the landscape remains indistinct. The precise gold frame is more resolved than the portrait.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.8-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 3.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
A readable sunset beach with clear requested subjects, appealing framing and purposeful accessories. Schematic anatomy, flattened foreground objects, repetitive water highlights and sparse directional shadows limit construction and physical depth. The kite's unresolved anchor also constrains integrity.
Qwen3.8-27B
The sweeping palm, glowing sunset and purple-to-orange palette create an appealing beach composition. Birds, animals and reflections fulfill the brief, with clean silhouettes and readable small accents. Schematic anatomy, repetitive shoreline geometry and limited perspective integration constrain depth. Foreground lighting and uniform reflection bars provide atmosphere but little physical coherence.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.8-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Qwen3.8-27B
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
A coherent, cheerful cartoon with recognizable animals, readable steering contact and useful small details. The dog's orientation follows the craft more successfully than a wholly frontal pose would. Simple anatomy, weak raccoon grip and compressed seating contacts still limit physical credibility. Gradients and spray provide polish without resolving complex construction.
Qwen3.8-27B
The raccoon clearly rides on the dog's back, and the dog reaches the jet ski's steering grip. Cheerful expressions, a bright palette and sweeping wake make the action readable. Anatomy and machinery remain simplified, with overlapping paws and limited seat definition. Flat lighting, sparse surface detail and broad white splash shapes limit depth and finish. A clipped gray fragment interrupts the upper-left corner.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.8-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 4.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
The distinctive bill, continuous silhouette and detailed wheels establish a readable pelican cyclist. Shaped feathers and soft shading add character, but jointless legs, crowded pedal contacts, absent steering contact and loosely directional lighting limit the construction. The comparisons support retaining the baseline category scores.
Qwen3.8-27B
The pelican’s oversized bill, straw hat and flowing scarf create a distinctive focal character against a well-composed coastal sunset. Wheels and frame are readable, but the wings do not reach the steering, overlapping legs obscure separate pedal contacts, and the crank linkage is unclear. Clean vector shapes and restrained shading support an appealing illustration with limited physical depth.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.8-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.