MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.6-27B

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

The main framing and visible paint-contact story are well supported. Major optical omissions dominate the result: sparse repetitions, undersized first images, missing outer chains and absent curved nested imagery prevent a coherent mirror-room system. The metallic forms remain convincing in volume but have a soft illustrative finish.

Qwen3.6-27B

The artwork depicts a shaded sphere, distinct paint colors and a separate airborne black blob. Crimson's apex overlap does not establish its earlier interaction and transport, while cyan's recent contact remains unsupported. Horizontal centering supplies limited camera agreement, but the sphere, black blob and prominent panel have substantial placement or projection departures. A few planar echoes provide reflection evidence; isolated patches and gradients replace most of the required mirror structure.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

An appealing rabbit with balanced framing, expressive eyes and purposeful costume accents. Simple frontal construction limits anatomical and spatial accomplishment. The orange orb provides an effective luminous focal point, but unreadable wrist connections weaken the requested gestures and prevent stronger integrity credit.

Qwen3.6-27B

An appealing decorative illustration with coordinated ornament, flowing panels and three glowing orbital lights. The arm arrangement reverses the requested sides. Uncertain neck continuity, concealed leg articulation, simplified paws, crowded chest jewelry and shallow surface modeling limit pose clarity and finish.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

A small rabbit in an explorer outfit floats with a luminous orb. The scene tests character anatomy, pose and the placement of geometric forms around it.

Qwen3.6-27B

A floating capybara in ornate robes tests character anatomy, layered fabric and the placement of surrounding luminous forms.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

The portrait is recognizable through its dark silhouette, slight smile and muted landscape, but replication is weak. A frontal, oversized head and symmetric torso replace the reference's turned seated pose; angular, separated hands omit its central gesture. Smooth shading maintains coherence while anatomical detail, depth and material rendering remain basic.

Qwen3.6-27B

The portrait loosely evokes Mona Lisa through its palette and silhouette. Readable pupils, brows and lips provide limited detail, and the torso remains continuous. The frontal elongated face, unresolved chest-level limb forms, shallow landscape and pervasive blur substantially weaken likeness, anatomy and finish.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

A readable sunset beach with clear requested subjects, appealing framing and purposeful accessories. Schematic anatomy, flattened foreground objects, repetitive water highlights and sparse directional shadows limit construction and physical depth. The kite's unresolved anchor also constrains integrity.

Qwen3.6-27B

A recognizable sunset beach with balanced palms, clean shapes and effective warm–cool contrast. Small animals and play equipment address the brief, but rudimentary anatomy, uncertain water contacts, sparse reflections and flat materials keep the drawing basic or uneven.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Qwen3.6-27B

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

A coherent, cheerful cartoon with recognizable animals, readable steering contact and useful small details. The dog's orientation follows the craft more successfully than a wholly frontal pose would. Simple anatomy, weak raccoon grip and compressed seating contacts still limit physical credibility. Gradients and spray provide polish without resolving complex construction.

Qwen3.6-27B

A readable cartoon with balanced colors, clean shapes and a clearly supported raccoon. Continuous body construction and modest shading deserve credit. Rudimentary limbs, unresolved steering connections, stiff gestures and schematic water effects limit physical credibility and finish.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

The distinctive bill, continuous silhouette and detailed wheels establish a readable pelican cyclist. Shaped feathers and soft shading add character, but jointless legs, crowded pedal contacts, absent steering contact and loosely directional lighting limit the construction. The comparisons support retaining the baseline category scores.

Qwen3.6-27B

A lively, coherent illustration with recognizable pelican features, purposeful accessories and useful surface variation. Ambiguous neck layering, uncertain pedal engagement and an unresolved drivetrain limit construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement, while inconsistent shadow direction and crowded overlaps constrain finish.