MiMo-V2.6-Pro 54.6/100Rank 13/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads Qwen3.5-9B by 37.4 points on StealthMark, 47.9 to 10.5. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on StealthMark. Qwen3.5-9B is 3.5× cheaper per output token and runs 39% faster in our speed test. Both take about 1M tokens of context.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceMiMo-V2.6-Pro ↗Qwen3.5-9B ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
The main framing and visible paint-contact story are well supported. Major optical omissions dominate the result: sparse repetitions, undersized first images, missing outer chains and absent curved nested imagery prevent a coherent mirror-room system. The metallic forms remain convincing in volume but have a soft illustrative finish.
Qwen3.5-9B
Horizontal centering and a separate airborne black blob are visible. Cyan's recent contact and crimson's forward transport are insufficiently demonstrated, while sphere support remains obscured. The enlarged, lowered sphere substantially changes the composition. The wall and floor sphere images, recursive room structure and curved emitter mappings are almost entirely missing.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 23.0/25 | 3.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 12.0/15 | 4.5/15 |
| Reflections | 19.0/120 | 2.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 7.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
An appealing rabbit with balanced framing, expressive eyes and purposeful costume accents. Simple frontal construction limits anatomical and spatial accomplishment. The orange orb provides an effective luminous focal point, but unreadable wrist connections weaken the requested gestures and prevent stronger integrity credit.
Qwen3.5-9B
Glowing teal spheres and a harmonious palette provide visible strengths, but the central character remains seriously unresolved. A large gap separates head and torso, limbs cannot be traced, and scattered garment shapes fail to establish the ornate costume. The foreground mound replaces the tall enclosing arch. Clean primitive edges do not repair these construction failures.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.5/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
A small rabbit in an explorer outfit floats with a luminous orb. The scene tests character anatomy, pose and the placement of geometric forms around it.
Qwen3.5-9B
A floating capybara in ornate robes tests character anatomy, layered fabric and the placement of surrounding luminous forms.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
The portrait is recognizable through its dark silhouette, slight smile and muted landscape, but replication is weak. A frontal, oversized head and symmetric torso replace the reference's turned seated pose; angular, separated hands omit its central gesture. Smooth shading maintains coherence while anatomical detail, depth and material rendering remain basic.
Qwen3.5-9B
A centered dark oval with sparse facial marks forms a simple graphic face, but scarcely replicates the Mona Lisa. The portrait's body, crossed hands, clothing and landscape are missing, while angular facial construction and flat tones lose its likeness, volume and subtle expression.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 3.5/10 | 0.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 0.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.0/10 | 0.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 0.5/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
A readable sunset beach with clear requested subjects, appealing framing and purposeful accessories. Schematic anatomy, flattened foreground objects, repetitive water highlights and sparse directional shadows limit construction and physical depth. The kite's unresolved anchor also constrains integrity.
Qwen3.5-9B
The beach is recognizable, and sweeping shoreline curves provide basic rhythm. Wildlife and playful activity remain poorly resolved, with ambiguous body construction and object contact. The sun glows without corresponding reflections or surface lighting. Fragmented subjects and an unintegrated rectangular panel substantially weaken composition and finish.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.0/10 | 0.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.5/10 | 1.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.0/10 | 0.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Qwen3.5-9B
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
A coherent, cheerful cartoon with recognizable animals, readable steering contact and useful small details. The dog's orientation follows the craft more successfully than a wholly frontal pose would. Simple anatomy, weak raccoon grip and compressed seating contacts still limit physical credibility. Gradients and spray provide polish without resolving complex construction.
Qwen3.5-9B
Bright colors, clean individual shapes and basic animal cues make the scene partly recognizable. Back seating, body continuity, steering and jet ski construction remain unresolved. Background gradients and wave rhythm provide some finish, but substantial anatomical, spatial and interaction weaknesses dominate.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.0/10 | 1.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.5/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.5/10 | 1.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.0/10 | 1.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.5/10 | 1.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 4.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
The distinctive bill, continuous silhouette and detailed wheels establish a readable pelican cyclist. Shaped feathers and soft shading add character, but jointless legs, crowded pedal contacts, absent steering contact and loosely directional lighting limit the construction. The comparisons support retaining the baseline category scores.
Qwen3.5-9B
The oversized bill and orderly spoked wheels make the subject partly recognizable. Clean contours and strong color contrast provide graphic clarity, but unresolved appendages, steering, drivetrain and support dominate the construction. Sparse shading and detail further limit the illustration.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.5/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.5/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.