STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Mimo V2.6 Flash vs MISSINGNO.

Mimo V2.6 Flash scores 1.8 points higher overall (39.8 vs 38.0). MISSINGNO. leads General Intelligence; Mimo V2.6 Flash leads Visual Intelligence. MISSINGNO. scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
Model guide ↗

Overall StealthMark

39.8/100
38.0/100

General Intelligence

31.7/100
33.6/100

Visual Intelligence

49.5/100
43.3/100

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

Mimo V2.6 Flash9.2/100

Mimo V2.6 Flash: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The faint lower sphere image provides limited reflection evidence through reversed paint-color ordering. The wider reflection system and nested room imagery are absent. The colored beads do not resolve the required impact and transport history, while displaced paint positions and weak material rendering further limit the result.

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

MISSINGNO.24.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The centered sphere, separate airborne black blob and cyan-above-crimson ordering provide limited valid structure. The colored beads do not establish the required impact and transport histories. One dim floor image supports a small part of the optical system, while the defining wall repetitions, nested sphere imagery and emitter mappings are missing. Rounded volume and some gloss earn material credit, tempered by soft surface appearance and excessive paint-bead scale.

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Compare category scores
CategoryMimo V2.6 FlashMISSINGNO.
State at 600 ms5.0/2511.5/25
Camera and placement5.0/157.0/15
Reflections2.0/12012.0/120
Materials and scale2.0/105.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Selfie

Different task instructions

Mimo V2.6 Flash71.4/100

Mimo V2.6 Flash: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The centered rabbit has an appealing alert expression, a balanced silhouette, and a restrained technological palette. Outfit panels and orbital accents are cleanly resolved. The orb-holding paw has an ambiguous grip, the ears lack distinct angular bends, and the halo's interlocking construction is unclear. Soft shading suggests volume, but materials and spatial depth remain simplified.

Benchmark task

A small rabbit in an explorer outfit floats with a luminous orb. The scene tests character anatomy, pose and the placement of geometric forms around it.

MISSINGNO.49.7/100

MISSINGNO.: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

An appealing purple character with a readable pleased expression and raised-moustache joke. Smooth shading and clean contours support the simple design, but indistinct mitten grips, minimally textured curls and an uncompressed strap weaken the requested physical interaction. The jelly suggests gloss more convincingly than translucency.

Benchmark task

A glossy purple jelly struggles with an oversized fake moustache at a playful checkpoint. The scene tests comic expression, physical contact and the appearance of a soft translucent body.

Compare category scores
CategoryMimo V2.6 FlashMISSINGNO.
Task & likeness8.0/105.5/10
Anatomy & construction7.0/104.5/10
Space & placement7.5/106.0/10
Light & reflections7.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail7.5/104.5/10
Artistry & character6.0/104.5/10
Materials & effects6.5/104.0/10
Visual integrity8.0/106.0/10

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Mimo V2.6 Flash32.5/100

Mimo V2.6 Flash: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The dark clothing, long hair, folded hands and hazy landscape make the reference recognizable. Replication is limited by the frontal symmetry, elongated face, wide staring eyes and downturned mouth. Both arms connect to the hands, but the overlapping palms and looplike fingers are poorly resolved. Soft facial shading provides some volume; the clothing and landscape remain broad, simplified shapes.

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

MISSINGNO.28.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

Clean contours, connected body forms and gentle gradients support a basic, coherent portrait. Likeness remains weak: the face dominates the body, the seated angle is lost, and crossed hands become dark lobes without traceable wrists or fingers. Readable facial details add some drawing complexity, but clothing, landscape and material treatment remain sparse.

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Compare category scores
CategoryMimo V2.6 FlashMISSINGNO.
Task & likeness3.0/101.5/10
Anatomy & construction2.5/102.5/10
Space & placement4.0/102.5/10
Light & reflections3.0/103.0/10
Purposeful detail4.0/102.0/10
Artistry & character2.5/103.5/10
Materials & effects3.5/102.0/10
Visual integrity5.5/106.0/10

Beach

Different task instructions

Mimo V2.6 Flash67.0/100

Mimo V2.6 Flash: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The warm sunset, aligned reflection, framing palms and playful beach animals create an appealing, coherent scene. Small toys and shells remain readable. Drawing is simplified: animals have limited volume, water uses repetitive horizontal strokes, and foreground shadows do not consistently follow the central sun. Clean execution supports a competent illustration, but depth and material rendering remain modest.

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

MISSINGNO.43.9/100

MISSINGNO.: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent sunset beach with clear requested subjects, balanced framing and clean shapes. The aligned solar reflection and warm gradients establish atmosphere. Primitive animal construction, ambiguous furniture, sparse depth cues and minimally developed surfaces limit its drawing complexity and physical richness.

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Compare category scores
CategoryMimo V2.6 FlashMISSINGNO.
Task & likeness7.5/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction6.5/104.0/10
Space & placement7.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections6.0/105.0/10
Purposeful detail7.0/103.0/10
Artistry & character6.0/103.0/10
Materials & effects6.0/105.0/10
Visual integrity8.0/103.5/10

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Mimo V2.6 Flash48.8/100

Mimo V2.6 Flash: Ground Truth SVG benchmark
Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

MISSINGNO.44.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Ground Truth SVG benchmark
Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Mimo V2.6 Flash51.3/100

Mimo V2.6 Flash: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The raccoon riding the dog reads clearly, with expressive faces and a cheerful waterscape. The steering action is weak: no paw reaches the handlebar, which meets the dog's muzzle. The vehicle resembles a thin board with a steering post. Overlapping limbs obscure anatomy, while limited shadows, reflections and surface modeling keep the scene flat.

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

MISSINGNO.57.5/100

MISSINGNO.: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The requested interaction reads clearly through recognizable animals, expressive faces and a coherent hull-water relationship. Clean curves and readable accessories give the cartoon polish. Partly unresolved grips and supporting contacts limit physical construction; modest shape complexity, weak directional lighting and schematic water constrain its finish.

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Compare category scores
CategoryMimo V2.6 FlashMISSINGNO.
Task & likeness6.5/108.0/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/105.0/10
Space & placement6.0/105.5/10
Light & reflections4.5/105.0/10
Purposeful detail5.0/106.0/10
Artistry & character4.0/105.0/10
Materials & effects5.5/104.5/10
Visual integrity7.0/107.0/10

Pelican

Different task instructions

Mimo V2.6 Flash66.5/100

Mimo V2.6 Flash: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The pelican is immediately recognizable, with an expressive eye and prominent pouch, and the landscape provides clear framing. Clean outlines and spokes support the cheerful illustration. Both feet visibly miss the bicycle's pedal mechanism, weakening the riding action. Simplified machinery, shallow depth and loosely directional shading limit the requested masterpiece quality.

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.

MISSINGNO.58.8/100

MISSINGNO.: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent, cheerful illustration with recognizable pelican features, balanced composition, clean contours and useful small details. Its controlled curves and layered wheels demonstrate competent drawing skill. Ambiguous pedal and steering contacts, sparse drivetrain construction and weak directional lighting limit the riding mechanics and finish.

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.

Compare category scores
CategoryMimo V2.6 FlashMISSINGNO.
Task & likeness8.0/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/105.5/10
Space & placement7.0/106.0/10
Light & reflections6.0/105.0/10
Purposeful detail7.0/105.5/10
Artistry & character6.5/106.0/10
Materials & effects5.5/104.5/10
Visual integrity7.5/106.5/10