MiMo-V2.6-Flash 71.3/100Rank 36/471 of 3 levels

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads MiMo-V2.6-Flash by 3.3 points on StealthMark, 47.9 to 44.6. It leads on 5 of 9 benchmarks, including both games, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash on 4. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3.1× cheaper per output token and runs 4.7× faster in our speed test. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on StealthMark. Both take about 1M tokens of context.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceMiMo-V2.6-Flash ↗MiMo-V2.6-Pro ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


MiMo-V2.6-Flash
The faint lower sphere image provides limited reflection evidence through reversed paint-color ordering. The wider reflection system and nested room imagery are absent. The colored beads do not resolve the required impact and transport history, while displaced paint positions and weak material rendering further limit the result.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
The main framing and visible paint-contact story are well supported. Major optical omissions dominate the result: sparse repetitions, undersized first images, missing outer chains and absent curved nested imagery prevent a coherent mirror-room system. The metallic forms remain convincing in volume but have a soft illustrative finish.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 5.0/25 | 23.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 4.5/15 | 12.0/15 |
| Reflections | 6.5/120 | 19.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 2.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


MiMo-V2.6-Flash
The centered rabbit has an appealing alert expression, a balanced silhouette, and a restrained technological palette. Outfit panels and orbital accents are cleanly resolved. The orb-holding paw has an ambiguous grip, the ears lack distinct angular bends, and the halo's interlocking construction is unclear. Soft shading suggests volume, but materials and spatial depth remain simplified.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
An appealing rabbit with balanced framing, expressive eyes and purposeful costume accents. Simple frontal construction limits anatomical and spatial accomplishment. The orange orb provides an effective luminous focal point, but unreadable wrist connections weaken the requested gestures and prevent stronger integrity credit.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
A small rabbit in an explorer outfit floats with a luminous orb. The scene tests character anatomy, pose and the placement of geometric forms around it.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


MiMo-V2.6-Flash
The dark clothing, long hair, folded hands and hazy landscape make the reference recognizable. Replication is limited by the frontal symmetry, elongated face, wide staring eyes and downturned mouth. Both arms connect to the hands, but the overlapping palms and looplike fingers are poorly resolved. Soft facial shading provides some volume; the clothing and landscape remain broad, simplified shapes.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
The portrait is recognizable through its dark silhouette, slight smile and muted landscape, but replication is weak. A frontal, oversized head and symmetric torso replace the reference's turned seated pose; angular, separated hands omit its central gesture. Smooth shading maintains coherence while anatomical detail, depth and material rendering remain basic.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 3.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 2.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 3.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


MiMo-V2.6-Flash
The warm sunset, aligned reflection, framing palms and playful beach animals create an appealing, coherent scene. Small toys and shells remain readable. Drawing is simplified: animals have limited volume, water uses repetitive horizontal strokes, and foreground shadows do not consistently follow the central sun. Clean execution supports a competent illustration, but depth and material rendering remain modest.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
A readable sunset beach with clear requested subjects, appealing framing and purposeful accessories. Schematic anatomy, flattened foreground objects, repetitive water highlights and sparse directional shadows limit construction and physical depth. The kite's unresolved anchor also constrains integrity.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 7.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


MiMo-V2.6-Flash
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


MiMo-V2.6-Flash
The raccoon riding the dog reads clearly, with expressive faces and a cheerful waterscape. The steering action is weak: no paw reaches the handlebar, which meets the dog's muzzle. The vehicle resembles a thin board with a steering post. Overlapping limbs obscure anatomy, while limited shadows, reflections and surface modeling keep the scene flat.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
A coherent, cheerful cartoon with recognizable animals, readable steering contact and useful small details. The dog's orientation follows the craft more successfully than a wholly frontal pose would. Simple anatomy, weak raccoon grip and compressed seating contacts still limit physical credibility. Gradients and spray provide polish without resolving complex construction.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 4.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


MiMo-V2.6-Flash
The pelican is immediately recognizable, with an expressive eye and prominent pouch, and the landscape provides clear framing. Clean outlines and spokes support the cheerful illustration. Both feet visibly miss the bicycle's pedal mechanism, weakening the riding action. Simplified machinery, shallow depth and loosely directional shading limit the requested masterpiece quality.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
The distinctive bill, continuous silhouette and detailed wheels establish a readable pelican cyclist. Shaped feathers and soft shading add character, but jointless legs, crowded pedal contacts, absent steering contact and loosely directional lighting limit the construction. The comparisons support retaining the baseline category scores.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 7.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.