MAI-Thinking-1 6.4/100Rank 44/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Muse Spark Open leads MAI-Thinking-1 by 30.0 points on StealthMark, 44.1 to 14.1. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Muse Spark Open scores higher on Ground Truth.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Muse Spark Open scores higher on StealthMark, is 1.9× cheaper per output token, takes 4.1× more context and runs 3.9× faster in our speed test.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceMAI-Thinking-1 ↗Muse Spark Open ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


MAI-Thinking-1
The small paint features and convex shading deserve moderate material credit. The sphere remains undersized and low, with black unusually close to its apex. Crimson and cyan do not establish the required impact histories. Faint reflected echoes supply limited optical evidence, while the defining recursive room, nested sphere and emitter structures remain unestablished.
Muse Spark Open
The airborne black blob and deformed paint support the broad contact sequence, although cyan attachment and wheel-directed transport remain partial. The sphere and black blob have substantial framing errors. The dominant limitation is the largely absent mirror system: faint wall circles and isolated highlights provide little evidence of recursive room geometry or curved nested reflections. Oversized compact paint features and diffuse material treatment further limit credit.
| Category | MAI-Thinking-1 | Muse Spark Open |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 3.0/25 | 14.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 2.5/15 | 6.0/15 |
| Reflections | 4.0/120 | 8.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 2.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


MAI-Thinking-1
A recognizable lantern-and-moth illustration with appealing coloured wings and tidy outer contours. Simple construction, a small focal subject and crowded overlaps limit character and depth. The face, six-leg anatomy, seedling and antenna-driven watering joke remain insufficiently readable.
Muse Spark Open
The rounded silhouette and asymmetric expression make an appealing baby elephant, supported by a quiet background and grounding shadow. The protective action remains difficult to read: forefeet cannot be confidently traced into a grip, and seed contact is crowded by fine lines. Controlled simple shapes provide charm, but limited anatomical clarity, shading and surface detail leave the execution uneven.
| Category | MAI-Thinking-1 | Muse Spark Open |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 4.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
MAI-Thinking-1
A fluffy moth tends a lantern greenhouse amid a gardening mishap. The scene tests insect anatomy, expressive action, translucent wings and the interaction of light with small objects.
Muse Spark Open
A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


MAI-Thinking-1
A recognizable Mona Lisa motif emerges from dark hair, a pale face and a landscape band. Replication remains weak: the oversized frontal head, broad smile, unresolved torso and missing crossed-hand anatomy diverge substantially from the reference. Simple fills and sparse strokes provide limited volume, material definition or painterly complexity.
Muse Spark Open
A recognizable, orderly interpretation with clean major contours, connected body forms and modest facial shading. Wide eyes, frontal symmetry and schematic hands limit likeness and expression. Layered scenery establishes basic depth, but shallow arm overlaps, flat clothing and sparse fine detail keep the execution basic and uneven.
| Category | MAI-Thinking-1 | Muse Spark Open |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 1.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 0.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 1.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 1.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 1.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 1.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 0.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


MAI-Thinking-1
A coherent, cheerful beach scene with balanced placement, clean shapes and controlled sunset colours. Animals, birds and playful accessories are recognizable, but basic dolphin construction, weak grounding, schematic reflections and sparse material detail limit the drawing's accomplishment.
Muse Spark Open
A coherent sunset beach with readable activities, balanced framing and controlled colour transitions. Small accessories add interest, but schematic anatomy, limited surface detail, weak directional shadows and a geometric reflection constrain its finish. Most shapes and overlaps remain clean.
| Category | MAI-Thinking-1 | Muse Spark Open |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 4.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 3.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 4.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


MAI-Thinking-1
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Muse Spark Open
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


MAI-Thinking-1
The recognizable raccoon and clean, shaded forms make a readable cartoon. The dog's steering remains undemonstrated, while ambiguous seating contacts and a minimally constructed craft weaken the central interaction. Controlled gradients and edges deserve credit, but anatomy, purposeful detail and water displacement remain basic.
Muse Spark Open
Expressive faces, distinct accessories and clean color separation make the scene appealing and recognizable. Character detail is stronger than the functional construction: steering contact, limb overlaps and seating remain ambiguous. The readable hull and lively spray establish motion, while limited directional shading and simplified surfaces constrain depth and physical coherence.
| Category | MAI-Thinking-1 | Muse Spark Open |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 3.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 2.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 3.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


MAI-Thinking-1
A recognizable pelican and bicycle combine clean rounded forms, expressive facial details and effective surface shading. Aligned wheels and soft shadows establish placement, but unresolved pedal engagement, absent steering contact and sparse drivetrain construction weaken the riding action. Limited feather complexity and shallow space constrain an otherwise appealing illustration.
Muse Spark Open
A controlled, appealing cartoon with a recognizable pelican, expressive face and clean curved forms. Feather lines, spokes and bill shading provide useful complexity. Aligned wheels and a ground shadow establish placement, but uncertain pedal contacts and obscured mechanical connections weaken support and riding action. Lighting remains loosely coordinated with the sun.
| Category | MAI-Thinking-1 | Muse Spark Open |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 4.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.