STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Mai Thinking 1 vs MISSINGNO.

MISSINGNO. scores 18.7 points higher overall (38.0 vs 19.3). MISSINGNO. scores higher on Ground Truth.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
Model guide ↗

Overall StealthMark

19.3/100
38.0/100

General Intelligence

9.7/100
33.6/100

Visual Intelligence

30.8/100
43.3/100

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

Mai Thinking 115.0/100

Mai Thinking 1: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The small paint features and convex shading deserve moderate material credit. The sphere remains undersized and low, with black unusually close to its apex. Crimson and cyan do not establish the required impact histories. Faint reflected echoes supply limited optical evidence, while the defining recursive room, nested sphere and emitter structures remain unestablished.

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

MISSINGNO.24.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The centered sphere, separate airborne black blob and cyan-above-crimson ordering provide limited valid structure. The colored beads do not establish the required impact and transport histories. One dim floor image supports a small part of the optical system, while the defining wall repetitions, nested sphere imagery and emitter mappings are missing. Rounded volume and some gloss earn material credit, tempered by soft surface appearance and excessive paint-bead scale.

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Compare category scores
CategoryMai Thinking 1MISSINGNO.
State at 600 ms7.0/2511.5/25
Camera and placement2.5/157.0/15
Reflections4.0/12012.0/120
Materials and scale5.0/105.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Selfie

Different task instructions

Mai Thinking 146.3/100

Mai Thinking 1: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A recognizable lantern-and-moth illustration with appealing coloured wings and tidy outer contours. Simple construction, a small focal subject and crowded overlaps limit character and depth. The face, six-leg anatomy, seedling and antenna-driven watering joke remain insufficiently readable.

Benchmark task

A fluffy moth tends a lantern greenhouse amid a gardening mishap. The scene tests insect anatomy, expressive action, translucent wings and the interaction of light with small objects.

MISSINGNO.49.7/100

MISSINGNO.: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

An appealing purple character with a readable pleased expression and raised-moustache joke. Smooth shading and clean contours support the simple design, but indistinct mitten grips, minimally textured curls and an uncompressed strap weaken the requested physical interaction. The jelly suggests gloss more convincingly than translucency.

Benchmark task

A glossy purple jelly struggles with an oversized fake moustache at a playful checkpoint. The scene tests comic expression, physical contact and the appearance of a soft translucent body.

Compare category scores
CategoryMai Thinking 1MISSINGNO.
Task & likeness4.0/105.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/104.5/10
Space & placement5.0/106.0/10
Light & reflections4.5/105.5/10
Purposeful detail4.0/104.5/10
Artistry & character5.0/104.5/10
Materials & effects5.0/104.0/10
Visual integrity6.0/106.0/10

Mona Lisa

Same task instructions

Mai Thinking 111.8/100

Mai Thinking 1: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A recognizable Mona Lisa motif emerges from dark hair, a pale face and a landscape band. Replication remains weak: the oversized frontal head, broad smile, unresolved torso and missing crossed-hand anatomy diverge substantially from the reference. Simple fills and sparse strokes provide limited volume, material definition or painterly complexity.

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

MISSINGNO.28.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

Clean contours, connected body forms and gentle gradients support a basic, coherent portrait. Likeness remains weak: the face dominates the body, the seated angle is lost, and crossed hands become dark lobes without traceable wrists or fingers. Readable facial details add some drawing complexity, but clothing, landscape and material treatment remain sparse.

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Compare category scores
CategoryMai Thinking 1MISSINGNO.
Task & likeness1.0/101.5/10
Anatomy & construction0.5/102.5/10
Space & placement1.0/102.5/10
Light & reflections1.5/103.0/10
Purposeful detail1.0/102.0/10
Artistry & character1.5/103.5/10
Materials & effects0.5/102.0/10
Visual integrity3.0/106.0/10

Beach

Same task instructions

Mai Thinking 144.2/100

Mai Thinking 1: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent, cheerful beach scene with balanced placement, clean shapes and controlled sunset colours. Animals, birds and playful accessories are recognizable, but basic dolphin construction, weak grounding, schematic reflections and sparse material detail limit the drawing's accomplishment.

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

MISSINGNO.43.9/100

MISSINGNO.: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent sunset beach with clear requested subjects, balanced framing and clean shapes. The aligned solar reflection and warm gradients establish atmosphere. Primitive animal construction, ambiguous furniture, sparse depth cues and minimally developed surfaces limit its drawing complexity and physical richness.

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Compare category scores
CategoryMai Thinking 1MISSINGNO.
Task & likeness6.0/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction4.0/104.0/10
Space & placement5.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections4.0/105.0/10
Purposeful detail4.5/103.0/10
Artistry & character4.0/103.0/10
Materials & effects3.5/105.0/10
Visual integrity4.5/103.5/10

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Mai Thinking 11.8/100

Mai Thinking 1: Ground Truth SVG benchmark
Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

MISSINGNO.44.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Ground Truth SVG benchmark
Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Same task instructions

Mai Thinking 137.3/100

Mai Thinking 1: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The recognizable raccoon and clean, shaded forms make a readable cartoon. The dog's steering remains undemonstrated, while ambiguous seating contacts and a minimally constructed craft weaken the central interaction. Controlled gradients and edges deserve credit, but anatomy, purposeful detail and water displacement remain basic.

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

MISSINGNO.57.5/100

MISSINGNO.: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The requested interaction reads clearly through recognizable animals, expressive faces and a coherent hull-water relationship. Clean curves and readable accessories give the cartoon polish. Partly unresolved grips and supporting contacts limit physical construction; modest shape complexity, weak directional lighting and schematic water constrain its finish.

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Compare category scores
CategoryMai Thinking 1MISSINGNO.
Task & likeness4.0/108.0/10
Anatomy & construction2.5/105.0/10
Space & placement5.0/105.5/10
Light & reflections4.0/105.0/10
Purposeful detail3.5/106.0/10
Artistry & character3.5/105.0/10
Materials & effects4.0/104.5/10
Visual integrity6.0/107.0/10

Pelican

Same task instructions

Mai Thinking 156.5/100

Mai Thinking 1: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A recognizable pelican and bicycle combine clean rounded forms, expressive facial details and effective surface shading. Aligned wheels and soft shadows establish placement, but unresolved pedal engagement, absent steering contact and sparse drivetrain construction weaken the riding action. Limited feather complexity and shallow space constrain an otherwise appealing illustration.

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.

MISSINGNO.58.8/100

MISSINGNO.: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent, cheerful illustration with recognizable pelican features, balanced composition, clean contours and useful small details. Its controlled curves and layered wheels demonstrate competent drawing skill. Ambiguous pedal and steering contacts, sparse drivetrain construction and weak directional lighting limit the riding mechanics and finish.

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.

Compare category scores
CategoryMai Thinking 1MISSINGNO.
Task & likeness7.0/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/105.5/10
Space & placement5.5/106.0/10
Light & reflections7.0/105.0/10
Purposeful detail5.0/105.5/10
Artistry & character5.0/106.0/10
Materials & effects4.5/104.5/10
Visual integrity7.0/106.5/10