Ling 3.1 Flash 43.1/100Rank 42/471 of 3 levels

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Muse Wonder leads Ling 3.1 Flash by 14.8 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 42.2. It leads on 7 of 9 benchmarks, including both games, and Ling 3.1 Flash on 2. Muse Wonder scores higher on Ground Truth.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Ling 3.1 Flash is 22× cheaper per output token. Muse Wonder scores higher on StealthMark, takes 4× more context and runs 5× faster in our speed test.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceLing 3.1 Flash ↗Muse Wonder ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Ling 3.1 Flash
Central placement, separate airborne black paint and the elongated crimson coating earn substantial state and placement credit. Cyan contact remains unresolved. A few isolated sphere images provide limited optical evidence, while the defining repeated mirror structure is missing. Readable opaque metallic volume and restrained paint scale justify increased material credit. Core: 61.5/170; including the floor reward: 61.5/180.
Muse Wonder
The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.
| Category | Ling 3.1 Flash | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 22.0/25 | 22.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 13.5/15 | 12.0/15 |
| Reflections | 18.0/120 | 21.5/120 |
| Materials and scale | 7.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Ling 3.1 Flash
An appealing, coherent storybook ant with a clear expression, complete silhouette and readable signal mechanism. Clean curves and warm accents support the composition, while simplified joints, schematic hardware, limited material differentiation and modest light interaction constrain its finish.
Muse Wonder
An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.
| Category | Ling 3.1 Flash | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 7.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 7.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 7.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
Ling 3.1 Flash
An ant tending signals in a miniature workshop tests insect anatomy, purposeful gestures and the placement of small objects in a lit environment.
Muse Wonder
A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Ling 3.1 Flash
A basic, uneven Mona Lisa interpretation with a clear facial focal point, articulated eyes and modest tonal volume. Weak likeness, oversized head proportions, unclear shoulders, curled bare arms and indistinct hands limit replication. The compressed composition and rectangular torso weaken an otherwise coherent earthy palette.
Muse Wonder
A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.
| Category | Ling 3.1 Flash | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 1.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 1.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 2.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Ling 3.1 Flash
A coherent sunset illustration with harmonious color, clean silhouettes and readable beach details. Its calm composition works well, while playful activity is modest. Simplified animal anatomy, shallow shoreline layering, repetitive foliage and a geometric reflection limit drawing sophistication and naturalism.
Muse Wonder
A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.
| Category | Ling 3.1 Flash | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.5/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Ling 3.1 Flash
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Muse Wonder
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Ling 3.1 Flash
An appealing sunset cartoon with recognizable animals, expressive faces and coherent landscape layers. The sky and warm water streaks provide its strongest rendering. Ambiguous seated support, stiff forelegs, a shallow hull and an unclear steering connection limit construction. Clean shapes and readable accessories add finish, while restrained spray and flat surfaces limit material and motion effects.
Muse Wonder
An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.
| Category | Ling 3.1 Flash | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 7.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Ling 3.1 Flash
A clean, appealing pelican illustration with a readable bicycle and coherent landscape. Bill shading, feather layers and faint wheel shadows provide modest depth. Uncertain pedal contact, simplified leg construction and limited material rendering keep the result within competent illustration quality.
Muse Wonder
A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.
| Category | Ling 3.1 Flash | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.