Ling 3.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Ling 3.1 Flash

Central placement, separate airborne black paint and the elongated crimson coating earn substantial state and placement credit. Cyan contact remains unresolved. A few isolated sphere images provide limited optical evidence, while the defining repeated mirror structure is missing. Readable opaque metallic volume and restrained paint scale justify increased material credit. Core: 61.5/170; including the floor reward: 61.5/180.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

The main framing and visible paint-contact story are well supported. Major optical omissions dominate the result: sparse repetitions, undersized first images, missing outer chains and absent curved nested imagery prevent a coherent mirror-room system. The metallic forms remain convincing in volume but have a soft illustrative finish.

Ling 3.1 Flash

An appealing, coherent storybook ant with a clear expression, complete silhouette and readable signal mechanism. Clean curves and warm accents support the composition, while simplified joints, schematic hardware, limited material differentiation and modest light interaction constrain its finish.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

An appealing rabbit with balanced framing, expressive eyes and purposeful costume accents. Simple frontal construction limits anatomical and spatial accomplishment. The orange orb provides an effective luminous focal point, but unreadable wrist connections weaken the requested gestures and prevent stronger integrity credit.

Ling 3.1 Flash

An ant tending signals in a miniature workshop tests insect anatomy, purposeful gestures and the placement of small objects in a lit environment.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

A small rabbit in an explorer outfit floats with a luminous orb. The scene tests character anatomy, pose and the placement of geometric forms around it.

Ling 3.1 Flash

A basic, uneven Mona Lisa interpretation with a clear facial focal point, articulated eyes and modest tonal volume. Weak likeness, oversized head proportions, unclear shoulders, curled bare arms and indistinct hands limit replication. The compressed composition and rectangular torso weaken an otherwise coherent earthy palette.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

The portrait is recognizable through its dark silhouette, slight smile and muted landscape, but replication is weak. A frontal, oversized head and symmetric torso replace the reference's turned seated pose; angular, separated hands omit its central gesture. Smooth shading maintains coherence while anatomical detail, depth and material rendering remain basic.

Ling 3.1 Flash

A coherent sunset illustration with harmonious color, clean silhouettes and readable beach details. Its calm composition works well, while playful activity is modest. Simplified animal anatomy, shallow shoreline layering, repetitive foliage and a geometric reflection limit drawing sophistication and naturalism.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

A readable sunset beach with clear requested subjects, appealing framing and purposeful accessories. Schematic anatomy, flattened foreground objects, repetitive water highlights and sparse directional shadows limit construction and physical depth. The kite's unresolved anchor also constrains integrity.

Ling 3.1 Flash

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Ling 3.1 Flash

An appealing sunset cartoon with recognizable animals, expressive faces and coherent landscape layers. The sky and warm water streaks provide its strongest rendering. Ambiguous seated support, stiff forelegs, a shallow hull and an unclear steering connection limit construction. Clean shapes and readable accessories add finish, while restrained spray and flat surfaces limit material and motion effects.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

A coherent, cheerful cartoon with recognizable animals, readable steering contact and useful small details. The dog's orientation follows the craft more successfully than a wholly frontal pose would. Simple anatomy, weak raccoon grip and compressed seating contacts still limit physical credibility. Gradients and spray provide polish without resolving complex construction.

Ling 3.1 Flash

A clean, appealing pelican illustration with a readable bicycle and coherent landscape. Bill shading, feather layers and faint wheel shadows provide modest depth. Uncertain pedal contact, simplified leg construction and limited material rendering keep the result within competent illustration quality.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

The distinctive bill, continuous silhouette and detailed wheels establish a readable pelican cyclist. Shaped feathers and soft shading add character, but jointless legs, crowded pedal contacts, absent steering contact and loosely directional lighting limit the construction. The comparisons support retaining the baseline category scores.