STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Kolibri-1 vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads Kolibri-1 by 43.4 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 13.6. It leads on all 7 benchmarks with results for both. Muse Wonder scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

13.6/100Overall rank 52/53
57.0/100Overall rank 10/53

General Intelligence

12.3/100
53.1/100

Visual Intelligence

15.0/100
64.0/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

  • Kolibri-1Multi-step reasoning not measured

Open or local

Local modelOpen model · Apache-2.0

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Kolibri-1
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

Muse Wonder scores higher on StealthMark and runs 3.4× faster in our speed test. Both take about 1M tokens of context.

  • Kolibri-1
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Kolibri-1: No list priceMuse Wonder: $20$4 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Kolibri-1: 1MTiedMuse Wonder: 1MTied
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Kolibri-1: 166tokens/sMuse Wonder: 5703.4× fastertokens/s
SizeTotal and active parameters
Kolibri-1: 78.1B3.46B activeMuse Wonder: Not disclosed
Developer
Aleph AlphaMeta
Released
3 Oct 202612 Oct 2026
Origin
GermanyUnited States
Input → output
Text → textText, image, video, audio, PDF → text
Architecture
Mixture-of-Experts with 4:1 sliding-window-attention to global-attention patternNot published

Full datasheets, every price and sourceKolibri-1 ↗Muse Wonder ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 17/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 311 ptsTurn 17 / 20

Points per level

LevelKolibri-1Muse Wonder
Level 1Second Thoughts
No run
16 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
No run
10 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
No run
11 ptsOut of lives

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Muse Wonder 67.0/100Rank 17/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Points per level

LevelKolibri-1Muse Wonder
Level 1Hold the door
No run
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
No run
9 ptsCleared
Level 3Relay vault
No run
18.8 ptsCleared
Level 4Passing bay
No run
17.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
Level 5Second thoughts
No run
20.6 ptsCleared

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Kolibri-1

A segmented gray perimeter surrounds a black field containing one large, low-positioned gray sphere and two small colored circles. Rounded volume and restrained paint scale earn partial material credit. The image does not demonstrate the required optical structure, while paint history, airborne black and settled support remain largely unresolved.

Muse Wonder

The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.

Score breakdown

CategoryKolibri-1Muse Wonder
State at 600 ms9.5/2522.0/25
Camera and placement1.5/1512.0/15
Reflections0.0/12021.5/120
Materials and scale3.0/107.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Kolibri-1

A restrained ivory, teal and green palette gives the image simple graphic coherence. Execution remains rudimentary: detached oval wings, ambiguous central anatomy and unclear feeding contact prevent a convincing hummingbird scene. The requested feather structure, botanical detail, lighting and enclosing arch are largely unresolved.

Muse Wonder

An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.

Score breakdown

CategoryKolibri-1Muse Wonder
Task & likeness2.5/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction2.0/107.0/10
Space & placement3.0/107.5/10
Light & reflections2.0/107.0/10
Purposeful detail1.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character1.5/106.5/10
Materials & effects2.0/106.5/10
Visual integrity5.5/108.0/10

Benchmark task

Kolibri-1

A jewel-coloured hummingbird hovering in flight tests avian anatomy, delicate structure and iridescent surface detail.

Muse Wonder

A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Kolibri-1

The candidate offers a clean, highly simplified frontal portrait with warm skin and dark hair. Its oversized oval face, schematic features and unresolved body provide little Mona Lisa likeness. Missing crossed hands, clothing detail and landscape remove essential parts of the original composition; smooth gradients supply only limited volume.

Muse Wonder

A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.

Score breakdown

CategoryKolibri-1Muse Wonder
Task & likeness0.5/105.5/10
Anatomy & construction0.5/105.5/10
Space & placement0.0/105.5/10
Light & reflections0.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail0.0/105.5/10
Artistry & character0.5/105.5/10
Materials & effects0.5/105.0/10
Visual integrity0.5/106.5/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Different task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Kolibri-1

A recognizable sunset beach has an appealing purple-orange gradient and clean geometric edges. Birds and animals remain unresolved, terrain obscures the relationship between shore and water, and reflections are absent. Sparse detail, flat materials and limited activity keep the drawing elementary despite its tidy rendering.

Muse Wonder

A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.

Score breakdown

CategoryKolibri-1Muse Wonder
Task & likeness2.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction0.5/106.0/10
Space & placement3.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections1.0/106.5/10
Purposeful detail0.5/109.0/10
Artistry & character1.0/107.0/10
Materials & effects0.5/106.0/10
Visual integrity3.0/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Kolibri-1

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Muse Wonder

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Kolibri-1

Clean shapes and a readable coral platform provide basic graphic clarity, but the animal construction remains fragmented. A recognizable raccoon riding the dog's back, connected steering and convincing water contact are not demonstrated. Sparse detail, flat subjects and absent movement effects support retaining the baseline category assessments.

Muse Wonder

An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.

Score breakdown

CategoryKolibri-1Muse Wonder
Task & likeness1.5/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction1.0/105.5/10
Space & placement1.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections0.0/104.5/10
Purposeful detail0.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character0.5/105.5/10
Materials & effects0.5/107.0/10
Visual integrity3.5/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Different task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Kolibri-1

Clean shapes and aligned wheels establish a readable schematic scene. Pelican likeness, riding support and bicycle mechanics remain substantially unresolved. Sparse detail and flat surfaces limit expression and volume. Strong edge and fill integrity is a separate success and does not repair the construction.

Muse Wonder

A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryKolibri-1Muse Wonder
Task & likeness1.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction1.5/106.0/10
Space & placement1.5/107.5/10
Light & reflections3.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail1.5/108.5/10
Artistry & character1.0/107.5/10
Materials & effects1.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity3.5/108.0/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.