STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Kolibri 1 vs MISSINGNO.

MISSINGNO. scores 25.0 points higher overall (38.0 vs 13.0). MISSINGNO. scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
Model guide ↗

Overall StealthMark

13.0/100
38.0/100

General Intelligence

12.1/100
33.6/100

Visual Intelligence

14.2/100
43.3/100

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

Kolibri 19.9/100

Kolibri 1: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A segmented gray perimeter surrounds a black field containing one large, low-positioned gray sphere and two small colored circles. Rounded volume and restrained paint scale earn partial material credit. The image does not demonstrate the required optical structure, while paint history, airborne black and settled support remain largely unresolved.

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

MISSINGNO.24.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The centered sphere, separate airborne black blob and cyan-above-crimson ordering provide limited valid structure. The colored beads do not establish the required impact and transport histories. One dim floor image supports a small part of the optical system, while the defining wall repetitions, nested sphere imagery and emitter mappings are missing. Rounded volume and some gloss earn material credit, tempered by soft surface appearance and excessive paint-bead scale.

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Compare category scores
CategoryKolibri 1MISSINGNO.
State at 600 ms8.5/2511.5/25
Camera and placement1.5/157.0/15
Reflections0.0/12012.0/120
Materials and scale3.0/105.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Selfie

Different task instructions

Kolibri 122.9/100

Kolibri 1: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A restrained ivory, teal and green palette gives the image simple graphic coherence. Execution remains rudimentary: detached oval wings, ambiguous central anatomy and unclear feeding contact prevent a convincing hummingbird scene. The requested feather structure, botanical detail, lighting and enclosing arch are largely unresolved.

Benchmark task

A jewel-coloured hummingbird hovering in flight tests avian anatomy, delicate structure and iridescent surface detail.

MISSINGNO.49.7/100

MISSINGNO.: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

An appealing purple character with a readable pleased expression and raised-moustache joke. Smooth shading and clean contours support the simple design, but indistinct mitten grips, minimally textured curls and an uncompressed strap weaken the requested physical interaction. The jelly suggests gloss more convincingly than translucency.

Benchmark task

A glossy purple jelly struggles with an oversized fake moustache at a playful checkpoint. The scene tests comic expression, physical contact and the appearance of a soft translucent body.

Compare category scores
CategoryKolibri 1MISSINGNO.
Task & likeness2.5/105.5/10
Anatomy & construction2.0/104.5/10
Space & placement3.0/106.0/10
Light & reflections2.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail1.5/104.5/10
Artistry & character1.5/104.5/10
Materials & effects2.0/104.0/10
Visual integrity5.5/106.0/10

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Kolibri 13.3/100

Kolibri 1: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The candidate offers a clean, highly simplified frontal portrait with warm skin and dark hair. Its oversized oval face, schematic features and unresolved body provide little Mona Lisa likeness. Missing crossed hands, clothing detail and landscape remove essential parts of the original composition; smooth gradients supply only limited volume.

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

MISSINGNO.28.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

Clean contours, connected body forms and gentle gradients support a basic, coherent portrait. Likeness remains weak: the face dominates the body, the seated angle is lost, and crossed hands become dark lobes without traceable wrists or fingers. Readable facial details add some drawing complexity, but clothing, landscape and material treatment remain sparse.

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Compare category scores
CategoryKolibri 1MISSINGNO.
Task & likeness0.5/101.5/10
Anatomy & construction0.5/102.5/10
Space & placement0.0/102.5/10
Light & reflections0.0/103.0/10
Purposeful detail0.0/102.0/10
Artistry & character0.5/103.5/10
Materials & effects0.5/102.0/10
Visual integrity0.5/106.0/10

Beach

Different task instructions

Kolibri 112.9/100

Kolibri 1: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A recognizable sunset beach has an appealing purple-orange gradient and clean geometric edges. Birds and animals remain unresolved, terrain obscures the relationship between shore and water, and reflections are absent. Sparse detail, flat materials and limited activity keep the drawing elementary despite its tidy rendering.

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

MISSINGNO.43.9/100

MISSINGNO.: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent sunset beach with clear requested subjects, balanced framing and clean shapes. The aligned solar reflection and warm gradients establish atmosphere. Primitive animal construction, ambiguous furniture, sparse depth cues and minimally developed surfaces limit its drawing complexity and physical richness.

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Compare category scores
CategoryKolibri 1MISSINGNO.
Task & likeness2.5/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction0.5/104.0/10
Space & placement3.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections1.0/105.0/10
Purposeful detail0.5/103.0/10
Artistry & character1.0/103.0/10
Materials & effects0.5/105.0/10
Visual integrity3.0/103.5/10

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Kolibri 120.7/100

Kolibri 1: Ground Truth SVG benchmark
Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

MISSINGNO.44.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Ground Truth SVG benchmark
Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Kolibri 110.0/100

Kolibri 1: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

Clean shapes and a readable coral platform provide basic graphic clarity, but the animal construction remains fragmented. A recognizable raccoon riding the dog's back, connected steering and convincing water contact are not demonstrated. Sparse detail, flat subjects and absent movement effects support retaining the baseline category assessments.

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

MISSINGNO.57.5/100

MISSINGNO.: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The requested interaction reads clearly through recognizable animals, expressive faces and a coherent hull-water relationship. Clean curves and readable accessories give the cartoon polish. Partly unresolved grips and supporting contacts limit physical construction; modest shape complexity, weak directional lighting and schematic water constrain its finish.

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Compare category scores
CategoryKolibri 1MISSINGNO.
Task & likeness1.5/108.0/10
Anatomy & construction1.0/105.0/10
Space & placement1.0/105.5/10
Light & reflections0.0/105.0/10
Purposeful detail0.5/106.0/10
Artistry & character0.5/105.0/10
Materials & effects0.5/104.5/10
Visual integrity3.5/107.0/10

Pelican

Different task instructions

Kolibri 117.5/100

Kolibri 1: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

Clean shapes and aligned wheels establish a readable schematic scene. Pelican likeness, riding support and bicycle mechanics remain substantially unresolved. Sparse detail and flat surfaces limit expression and volume. Strong edge and fill integrity is a separate success and does not repair the construction.

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.

MISSINGNO.58.8/100

MISSINGNO.: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent, cheerful illustration with recognizable pelican features, balanced composition, clean contours and useful small details. Its controlled curves and layered wheels demonstrate competent drawing skill. Ambiguous pedal and steering contacts, sparse drivetrain construction and weak directional lighting limit the riding mechanics and finish.

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.

Compare category scores
CategoryKolibri 1MISSINGNO.
Task & likeness1.5/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction1.5/105.5/10
Space & placement1.5/106.0/10
Light & reflections3.0/105.0/10
Purposeful detail1.5/105.5/10
Artistry & character1.0/106.0/10
Materials & effects1.0/104.5/10
Visual integrity3.5/106.5/10