STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Grok 4.7 vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads Grok 4.7 by 9.8 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 47.2. It leads on 7 of 9 benchmarks, including Latch, and Grok 4.7 on 2, including Foresight. Muse Wonder scores higher on Ground Truth.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

47.2/100Overall rank 22/53
57.0/100Overall rank 10/53

General Intelligence

48.4/100
53.1/100

Visual Intelligence

44.8/100
64.0/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

  • Grok 4.7

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Grok 4.7
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

Grok 4.7 is 3.3× cheaper per output token. Muse Wonder scores higher on StealthMark, takes 2.1× more context and runs 3.1× faster in our speed test.

  • Grok 4.7
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Grok 4.7: $63.3× cheaper$2 inputMuse Wonder: $20$4 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Grok 4.7: 500KMuse Wonder: 1M2.1× larger
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Grok 4.7: 185tokens/sMuse Wonder: 5703.1× fastertokens/s
Developer
SpaceXAIMeta
Released
21 Sep 202612 Oct 2026
Origin
United StatesBoth
Input → output
Text, image → textText, image, video, audio, PDF → text

Full datasheets, every price and sourceGrok 4.7 ↗Muse Wonder ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Grok 4.7 72.6/100Rank 3/47

Survived 3 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 316 ptsTurn 20 / 20

Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 17/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 311 ptsTurn 17 / 20

Points per level

LevelGrok 4.7Muse Wonder
Level 1Second Thoughts
25 ptsSurvived
16 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
13 ptsSurvived
10 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
16 ptsSurvived
11 ptsOut of lives

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Grok 4.7 65.4/100Rank 18/48

Cleared 4 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.4 ptsTurn 28 / 40

Muse Wonder 67.0/100Rank 17/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Points per level

LevelGrok 4.7Muse Wonder
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
9.8 ptsCleared
9 ptsCleared
Level 3Relay vault
11.6 ptsFinished early
18.8 ptsCleared
Level 4Passing bay
18.2 ptsClearedFinished early · 3 beacons left
17.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
Level 5Second thoughts
20.4 ptsCleared
20.6 ptsCleared

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Grok 4.7

Some sphere reflections are correctly placed, with useful size progression and a floor image. Their overlapping side continuations and inverted floor paint order provide additional local optical cues. The gross paint sequence is recognizable, although crimson is a little too low. Incorrect lamp projections and absent nested and receding imagery still leave the mirror system largely incomplete.

Muse Wonder

The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.

Score breakdown

CategoryGrok 4.7Muse Wonder
State at 600 ms23.0/2522.0/25
Camera and placement12.5/1512.0/15
Reflections26.0/12021.5/120
Materials and scale6.5/107.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Grok 4.7

The bold spiral dominates an appealing, restrained silhouette, with crisp angular turns and subtle charcoal highlights. However, a visible background gap separates the shell from the body, making the shell appear suspended. The connected head and delicate eye stalks read clearly, while shading and small features remain simple.

Muse Wonder

An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.

Score breakdown

CategoryGrok 4.7Muse Wonder
Task & likeness7.0/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction5.0/107.0/10
Space & placement5.5/107.5/10
Light & reflections4.0/107.0/10
Purposeful detail2.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character3.5/106.5/10
Materials & effects2.5/106.5/10
Visual integrity7.5/108.0/10

Benchmark task

Grok 4.7

A dark snail with a geometric spiral shell tests silhouette, curved construction and restrained material shading.

Muse Wonder

A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Grok 4.7

Dark clothing, overlapping hands and a restrained smile make the reference recognizable. The broad frontal face, elongated neck and oversized head weaken likeness and anatomical proportion; rounded hands lack convincing fingers. Gentle facial shading suggests volume, while clothing and landscape remain flat. Angular veil overlaps and a hard horizontal background boundary weaken the finish.

Muse Wonder

A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.

Score breakdown

CategoryGrok 4.7Muse Wonder
Task & likeness2.0/105.5/10
Anatomy & construction2.0/105.5/10
Space & placement3.0/105.5/10
Light & reflections1.5/105.5/10
Purposeful detail3.0/105.5/10
Artistry & character2.5/105.5/10
Materials & effects2.0/105.0/10
Visual integrity3.0/106.5/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Different task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Grok 4.7

The warm sunset, blue water and scattered beach activities create a cheerful, readable composition. Animals and equipment use basic silhouettes, with limited anatomical detail and grounding. The sun reflection forms a rigid tapered strip, and foreground objects lack cast shadows. Clean shapes support the illustration, but depth, materials and drawing complexity remain modest.

Muse Wonder

A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.

Score breakdown

CategoryGrok 4.7Muse Wonder
Task & likeness7.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/106.0/10
Space & placement5.5/106.5/10
Light & reflections6.0/106.5/10
Purposeful detail5.0/109.0/10
Artistry & character3.5/107.0/10
Materials & effects4.5/106.0/10
Visual integrity6.0/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Grok 4.7

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Muse Wonder

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Grok 4.7

The raccoon rides clearly on the dog's back, and expressive faces, bright colors and a readable orange hull create a playful composition. Steering is unresolved: the dog's visible paws rest on the deck rather than grasping the controls. Simple body shapes and ribbonlike wake limit construction and movement. The glowing sun produces little corresponding illumination or reflection.

Muse Wonder

An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.

Score breakdown

CategoryGrok 4.7Muse Wonder
Task & likeness7.0/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/105.5/10
Space & placement6.5/106.5/10
Light & reflections4.5/104.5/10
Purposeful detail5.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character5.5/105.5/10
Materials & effects5.5/107.0/10
Visual integrity3.5/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Different task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Grok 4.7

The pelican reads clearly through its long bill, throat pouch and curved neck. Clean pastel shapes and balanced scenery make an appealing illustration. The riding mechanism is less convincing: feet lack clear pedal contact, steering is unresolved, and the frame lacks a coherent drivetrain. Simple shading and sparse feather detail limit depth and finish.

Muse Wonder

A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryGrok 4.7Muse Wonder
Task & likeness7.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/106.0/10
Space & placement6.5/107.5/10
Light & reflections6.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail6.0/108.5/10
Artistry & character5.5/107.5/10
Materials & effects5.5/106.0/10
Visual integrity6.0/108.0/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.