STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

GLM-5.3 vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads GLM-5.3 by 11.9 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 45.1. It leads on 7 of 9 benchmarks, including both games, and GLM-5.3 on 2. Muse Wonder scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

45.1/100Overall rank 27/53
57.0/100Overall rank 10/53

General Intelligence

37.6/100
53.1/100

Visual Intelligence

57.2/100
64.0/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

Open or local

Open modelGLM-5.3 License

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • GLM-5.3
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

GLM-5.3 is 4.5× cheaper per output token. Muse Wonder scores higher on StealthMark and runs 6.6× faster in our speed test. Both take about 1M tokens of context.

  • GLM-5.3
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
GLM-5.3: $4.404.5× cheaper$1.40 inputMuse Wonder: $20$4 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
GLM-5.3: 1MTied128K max outputMuse Wonder: 1MTied
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
GLM-5.3: 86tokens/sMuse Wonder: 5706.6× fastertokens/s
SizeTotal and active parameters
GLM-5.3: 753BAll activeMuse Wonder: Not disclosed
Developer
Z.AIMeta
Released
17 Aug 202612 Oct 2026
Origin
ChinaUnited States
Input → output
Text → textText, image, video, audio, PDF → text
Architecture
GLM MoE with DSA sparse attentionNot published

Full datasheets, every price and sourceGLM-5.3 ↗Muse Wonder ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

GLM-5.3 59.1/100Rank 22/472 of 3 levels

2 of 3 played
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 26 ptsTurn 10 / 18

Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 17/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 311 ptsTurn 17 / 20

Points per level

LevelGLM-5.3Muse Wonder
Level 1Second Thoughts
27 ptsSurvived
16 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
6 ptsOut of lives
10 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
Pending
11 ptsOut of lives

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

GLM-5.3 25.6/100Rank 37/48

Cleared 2 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 512.2 ptsTurn 14 / 40

Muse Wonder 67.0/100Rank 17/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Points per level

LevelGLM-5.3Muse Wonder
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
9 ptsCleared
9 ptsCleared
Level 3Relay vault
7.6 ptsFinished early
18.8 ptsCleared
Level 4Passing bay
3.2 ptsFinished early
17.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
Level 5Second thoughts
12.2 ptsFinished early
20.6 ptsCleared

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

GLM-5.3

The sphere has readable rounded volume, and the compact black blob remains distinctly above it, supporting pre-impact separation. The extensive red and cyan coatings do not establish the required interaction history or paint scale. The sphere and black are substantially displaced downward. A centered upper panel, paired side patches and a vertically aligned partial floor image provide limited reflection cues, but ordered mirror-room repetitions and curved spherical imagery are largely missing.

Muse Wonder

The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.

Score breakdown

CategoryGLM-5.3Muse Wonder
State at 600 ms9.0/2522.0/25
Camera and placement9.0/1512.0/15
Reflections10.0/12021.5/120
Materials and scale7.0/107.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

GLM-5.3

A luminous organic creature meets a geometric reflection in a carefully framed oval mirror. Shared glowing cores and fingertip contact make the introspective symbolism clear. Gold, cream and blue establish a controlled hierarchy. The creature’s lower anatomy and shoulder transition remain loosely defined, while ground contact and reflected depth are mostly symbolic. Elegant vector illustration rather than photographic rendering.

Muse Wonder

An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.

Score breakdown

CategoryGLM-5.3Muse Wonder
Task & likeness9.0/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction7.0/107.0/10
Space & placement7.0/107.5/10
Light & reflections8.0/107.0/10
Purposeful detail8.0/107.5/10
Artistry & character7.0/106.5/10
Materials & effects7.5/106.5/10
Visual integrity8.0/108.0/10

Benchmark task

GLM-5.3

An imagined creature encounters its reflection. The scene tests original character design, visual self-interpretation and the relationship between a subject and its reflected image.

Muse Wonder

A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

GLM-5.3

Recognizable Mona Lisa motifs include the dark veil, restrained smile, folded hands and muted landscape. Clean silhouettes and balanced framing support the portrait, but the frontal symmetry, elongated face, minimally articulated hands and broad background bands make the replication basic. Facial shading offers some volume; clothing and landscape remain mostly flat.

Muse Wonder

A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.

Score breakdown

CategoryGLM-5.3Muse Wonder
Task & likeness3.0/105.5/10
Anatomy & construction2.0/105.5/10
Space & placement3.0/105.5/10
Light & reflections4.5/105.5/10
Purposeful detail3.0/105.5/10
Artistry & character2.5/105.5/10
Materials & effects3.5/105.0/10
Visual integrity4.0/106.5/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Different task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

GLM-5.3

A cohesive, colorful beach illustration with an inviting sunset, readable animals and playful foreground objects. Crisp silhouettes and small accessories reward inspection. Depth remains shallow, airborne dolphins lack convincing launch splashes, and several objects lack grounding shadows. The broad dark shape across the sun weakens the focal hierarchy.

Muse Wonder

A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.

Score breakdown

CategoryGLM-5.3Muse Wonder
Task & likeness8.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction7.5/106.0/10
Space & placement7.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections7.0/106.5/10
Purposeful detail8.0/109.0/10
Artistry & character7.5/107.0/10
Materials & effects6.5/106.0/10
Visual integrity7.5/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

GLM-5.3

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Muse Wonder

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

GLM-5.3

The raccoon rides on the dog's back, and the dog reaches toward visible handlebars. Expressive faces and clean colors make the action readable. Overlapping paws and hindquarters weaken anatomical clarity, while the vehicle resembles a flat board with a thin steering post. The wake suggests motion, but water contact, shadows and reflections receive little development.

Muse Wonder

An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.

Score breakdown

CategoryGLM-5.3Muse Wonder
Task & likeness6.5/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/105.5/10
Space & placement5.5/106.5/10
Light & reflections4.0/104.5/10
Purposeful detail5.0/107.5/10
Artistry & character4.0/105.5/10
Materials & effects5.0/107.0/10
Visual integrity7.5/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Different task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

GLM-5.3

The expressive pelican, broad bill and clean coastal composition make the subject immediately readable. Both legs connect to the body and reach pedals, but the front wheel lacks a connected fork and the wings do not engage visible handlebars. Crisp spokes and feather lines add interest; flat lighting, absent ground shadows and a fish floating above the horizon weaken physical coherence.

Muse Wonder

A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryGLM-5.3Muse Wonder
Task & likeness7.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.0/106.0/10
Space & placement6.0/107.5/10
Light & reflections4.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail6.5/108.5/10
Artistry & character6.5/107.5/10
Materials & effects5.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity5.5/108.0/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.