Gemma 4 31B 30.2/100Rank 30/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Muse Wonder leads Gemma 4 31B by 31.2 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 25.8. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Muse Wonder scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Gemma 4 31B is 50× cheaper per output token. Muse Wonder scores higher on StealthMark, takes 4× more context and runs 4.9× faster in our speed test.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceGemma 4 31B ↗Muse Wonder ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Gemma 4 31B
The sphere's volume, separate airborne black blob and vertical color ordering are readable. The large, low sphere, plain surrounding planes and absent nested optical imagery leave the central geometric and reflection requirements unsupported. Paint contact and transport remain unresolved. Material credit recognizes the visible convex shading, highlights and distinct surface colors while retaining deductions for the schematic finish and oversized blobs.
Muse Wonder
The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 11.0/25 | 22.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 3.0/15 | 12.0/15 |
| Reflections | 0.0/120 | 21.5/120 |
| Materials and scale | 5.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Gemma 4 31B
A clean, appealing luminous mascot with coherent body continuity and a readable jar-hugging pose. Rounded highlights, smooth gradients and balanced framing work well. The teardrop silhouette, modest eyes and nearly even grin only partly satisfy the character brief; sparse jar construction and simple geometry limit sophistication.
Muse Wonder
An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
Gemma 4 31B
A small luminous creature proudly holding an empty glass jar tests expression, transparent materials and the balance of character and prop.
Muse Wonder
A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Gemma 4 31B
The portrait is recognizable through its silhouette, palette and smile, with clean execution of simple shapes. Replication remains weak: the face and pose differ markedly, hands become fingerless ovals, clothing lacks construction, and the landscape loses its atmospheric detail. Basic gradients provide limited volume.
Muse Wonder
A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 4.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Gemma 4 31B
A coherent beach illustration with clean silhouettes, a sweeping shoreline and an effective sunset palette. Requested subjects are recognizable, but primitive animal construction, sparse detail, unsupported palm placement and schematic reflections limit drawing sophistication and physical credibility.
Muse Wonder
A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 5.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 2.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Gemma 4 31B
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Muse Wonder
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Gemma 4 31B
Clean, simple silhouettes communicate a raccoon riding on a dog. Limited animal specificity, absent steering controls and a flat platform weaken the requested scene. Small facial marks provide purposeful detail, while unresolved support, flat lighting and schematic water restrict physical coherence. Primitive but coherent construction supports basic drawing quality.
Muse Wonder
An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 1.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Gemma 4 31B
A clean, readable illustration with balanced placement and coherent basic geometry. The sky gradient and ground shadow establish diffuse illumination. Primitive shapes and sparse detail limit artistry, while unclear leg attachment, missing pedal contact and unresolved steering weaken the riding action.
Muse Wonder
A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 4.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.