STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads Gemma 4 26B A4B by 40.5 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 16.5. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Muse Wonder scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

16.5/100Overall rank 50/53
57.0/100Overall rank 10/53

General Intelligence

9.4/100
53.1/100

Visual Intelligence

28.9/100
64.0/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

  • Gemma 4 26B A4B

Open or local

Local modelOpen model · Apache 2.0

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Gemma 4 26B A4B
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

Gemma 4 26B A4B is 67× cheaper per output token. Muse Wonder scores higher on StealthMark, takes 4× more context and runs 6× faster in our speed test.

  • Gemma 4 26B A4B
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Gemma 4 26B A4B: $0.3067× cheaper$0.09 inputMuse Wonder: $20$4 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Gemma 4 26B A4B: 256KMuse Wonder: 1M4× larger
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Gemma 4 26B A4B: 95tokens/sMuse Wonder: 5706× fastertokens/s
SizeTotal and active parameters
Gemma 4 26B A4B: 25.2B3.8B activeMuse Wonder: Not disclosed
Developer
Google DeepMindMeta
Released
2 Apr 202612 Oct 2026
Origin
United StatesBoth
Input → output
Text, image → textText, image, video, audio, PDF → text
Architecture
Mixture-of-Experts multimodal transformer with interleaved sliding-window and global attentionNot published

Full datasheets, every price and sourceGemma 4 26B A4B ↗Muse Wonder ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Gemma 4 26B A4B 4.1/100Rank 46/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 32 ptsTurn 9 / 20

Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 17/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 311 ptsTurn 17 / 20

Points per level

LevelGemma 4 26B A4BMuse Wonder
Level 1Second Thoughts
3 ptsOut of lives
16 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
2 ptsOut of lives
10 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
2 ptsOut of lives
11 ptsOut of lives

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Gemma 4 26B A4B 4.5/100Rank 41/48

Cleared 2 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 53 ptsTurn 40 / 40

Muse Wonder 67.0/100Rank 17/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Points per level

LevelGemma 4 26B A4BMuse Wonder
Level 1Hold the door
3 ptsCleared1 beacon left
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
6.2 ptsFinished early
9 ptsCleared
Level 3Relay vault
15.2 ptsClearedFinished early · 3 beacons left
18.8 ptsCleared
Level 4Passing bay
11.8 ptsFinished early
17.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
Level 5Second thoughts
3 ptsOut of turns
20.6 ptsCleared

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Separate airborne black and contact-compatible paint flattening earn partial state credit. Settlement, adhesion and differentiated paint transport remain unresolved. The enlarged, low sphere and thin lamp strip substantially depart from the required camera, while the defining mirror structure is missing. Weak material appearance and oversized black paint limit material credit. The retained base total is 18/170; the floor-damage reward is 0, giving 18/180.

Muse Wonder

The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemma 4 26B A4BMuse Wonder
State at 600 ms10.0/2522.0/25
Camera and placement2.0/1512.0/15
Reflections0.0/12021.5/120
Materials and scale2.5/107.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Gemma 4 26B A4B

An appealing, readable sparkle-creature with luminous colour and expressive eyes. Simple geometric construction limits sophistication, while sharp body points, ambiguous hand contact and a minimally resolved jar weaken the requested soft, plump character and treasure-presenting pose.

Muse Wonder

An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemma 4 26B A4BMuse Wonder
Task & likeness5.5/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/107.0/10
Space & placement6.0/107.5/10
Light & reflections6.0/107.0/10
Purposeful detail5.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character4.0/106.5/10
Materials & effects6.0/106.5/10
Visual integrity7.0/108.0/10

Benchmark task

Gemma 4 26B A4B

A small luminous creature proudly holding an empty glass jar tests expression, transparent materials and the balance of character and prop.

Muse Wonder

A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Gemma 4 26B A4B

The centered dark-haired portrait provides a loose reference cue, but its elongated, nearly featureless face and undifferentiated torso fall far short of replication. Crossed hands, the subtle smile, clothing structure and landscape are unresolved. Clean silhouettes and soft gradients provide limited coherence.

Muse Wonder

A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemma 4 26B A4BMuse Wonder
Task & likeness0.5/105.5/10
Anatomy & construction2.0/105.5/10
Space & placement1.0/105.5/10
Light & reflections2.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail1.0/105.5/10
Artistry & character2.0/105.5/10
Materials & effects1.0/105.0/10
Visual integrity4.5/106.5/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Different task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Gemma 4 26B A4B

A clean, balanced sunset scene demonstrates the beach, birds and a centered reflection. Animals and play receive only minimal treatment. Coherent layers and controlled gradients support readability, but unresolved aquatic anatomy, sparse details and weak surface modeling keep the drawing basic.

Muse Wonder

A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemma 4 26B A4BMuse Wonder
Task & likeness3.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction2.0/106.0/10
Space & placement3.5/106.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/106.5/10
Purposeful detail1.0/109.0/10
Artistry & character1.5/107.0/10
Materials & effects2.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity6.0/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Gemma 4 26B A4B

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Muse Wonder

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Gemma 4 26B A4B

The animal stack is recognizable, and clean silhouettes support a basic illustration. Steering is not depicted, while the craft's construction and water contact remain unresolved. Sparse anatomical and material detail limit the finish. The sky gradient and glow provide atmospheric lighting, but the subjects lack corresponding modeling.

Muse Wonder

An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemma 4 26B A4BMuse Wonder
Task & likeness2.5/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction2.5/105.5/10
Space & placement4.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections3.5/104.5/10
Purposeful detail2.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character3.0/105.5/10
Materials & effects2.0/107.0/10
Visual integrity7.0/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Different task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Gemma 4 26B A4B

A clean, balanced icon suggests a pelican riding a bicycle. Continuous contours and restrained colors support its finish, but the abbreviated bill, undifferentiated body, unresolved riding contacts and incomplete bicycle mechanism limit likeness and construction. Sparse detail and flat lighting keep the drawing basic despite its clarity.

Muse Wonder

A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemma 4 26B A4BMuse Wonder
Task & likeness3.0/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction3.0/106.0/10
Space & placement5.0/107.5/10
Light & reflections3.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail3.0/108.5/10
Artistry & character2.5/107.5/10
Materials & effects2.5/106.0/10
Visual integrity5.0/108.0/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.