STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Crouton Alpha vs MiniMax M3

Crouton Alpha leads MiniMax M3 by 9.4 points on StealthMark, 48.0 to 38.6. It leads on 6 of 9 benchmarks, including both games, and MiniMax M3 on 3. Crouton Alpha scores higher on Ground Truth.

See the difference ↘
Model guide ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

48.0/100Overall rank 23/56
38.6/100Overall rank 40/56

General Intelligence

43.5/100
29.5/100

Visual Intelligence

56.0/100
53.2/100

Reasoning efficiency

How many reasoning tokens a model needs for the quality it delivers.

Single-step reasoning How much it reasons to understand a task

Multi-step reasoning How much it keeps reasoning as a task goes on

  • MiniMax M3

Cost efficiency

How much Performance you get for your money.

  • Crouton AlphaNot measured

Open or local

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Crouton Alpha
  • MiniMax M3
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

  • Crouton Alpha
  • MiniMax M3
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Crouton Alpha: No list priceMiniMax M3: $1.20$0.30 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Crouton Alpha: Not publishedMiniMax M3: 1M512K max output
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Crouton Alpha: 175Tiedtokens/sMiniMax M3: 162Tiedtokens/s
SizeTotal and active parameters
Crouton Alpha: Not disclosedMiniMax M3: 428B23B active
Developer
Not publishedMiniMax
Released
Not published1 Jun 2026
Origin
Not publishedSingapore
Input → output
Not publishedText, image, video → text
Architecture
Not publishedMixture-of-Experts with MiniMax Sparse Attention and native multimodal encoder

Full datasheets, every price and sourceMiniMax M3 ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Crouton Alpha 32.3/100Rank 29/52

Survived 1 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 39 ptsTurn 20 / 20

MiniMax M3 22.1/100Rank 42/52

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 36 ptsTurn 7 / 20

Points per level

LevelCrouton AlphaMiniMax M3
Level 1Second Thoughts
3 ptsOut of lives
17 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
7 ptsOut of lives
3 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
9 ptsSurvived
6 ptsOut of lives

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Crouton Alpha 59.5/100Rank 24/53

Cleared 4 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.2 ptsTurn 29 / 40

MiniMax M3 31.4/100Rank 39/53

Cleared 2 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 58.8 ptsTurn 11 / 40

Points per level

LevelCrouton AlphaMiniMax M3
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
9.4 ptsCleared
9.4 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
Level 3Relay vault
11.2 ptsFinished early
0.2 ptsFinished early
Level 4Passing bay
18.2 ptsClearedFinished early · 3 beacons left
14.2 ptsFinished early
Level 5Second thoughts
20.2 ptsCleared
8.8 ptsFinished early

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Crouton Alpha

The artwork establishes approximate central placement, a separate airborne black blob, and basic wall and floor sphere images. Its defining weaknesses are the largely absent recursive reflection system, missing emitter mappings, satin steel appearance and unresolved paint interaction. The black lateral wedges do not establish a separate viewport, and the hidden floor contact does not establish a gap. The category values remain unchanged.

MiniMax M3

The centered sphere, aligned left wall image, smaller lower-left continuation and partially occluded floor image provide recognizable local mirror coherence. Cyan remains airborne, the main sphere resembles white marble, and missing right-side imagery, recursive optics and panel mappings leave the scene substantially incomplete.

Score breakdown

CategoryCrouton AlphaMiniMax M3
State at 600 ms19.0/257.0/25
Camera and placement11.0/1514.5/15
Reflections21.5/12022.0/120
Materials and scale6.0/105.0/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Crouton Alpha

A cheerful, readable cartoon captures the crouton's signature expression and many specific accessories. Coherent cube geometry and foreground foreshortening support the selfie. Simple construction and flat material treatment limit its sophistication, while the tipping raft, advancing soup and unnoticed soaking remain insufficiently clear.

MiniMax M3

The oversized coral M silhouette dominates clearly, with an expressive charcoal face and appealing miniature body. Limbs connect coherently and the cube reads clearly. The lowered left hand only loosely suggests the requested hip pose. Thin highlights and simple gradients provide limited sculptural volume; the cube's glow and grounding shadow are restrained.

Score breakdown

CategoryCrouton AlphaMiniMax M3
Task & likeness6.5/108.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/106.0/10
Space & placement6.5/107.0/10
Light & reflections5.5/106.0/10
Purposeful detail7.0/104.0/10
Artistry & character5.0/104.0/10
Materials & effects5.5/104.0/10
Visual integrity7.5/108.0/10

Benchmark task

Crouton Alpha

Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.

MiniMax M3

A small robot with an oversized angular head presents a glowing object. The scene tests character proportions, gesture and contrasting materials.

Mona Lisa

Same task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Crouton Alpha

A recognizable, coherent simplification with readable eyes, a restrained smile and modest facial volume. Frontal symmetry, an oversized head, capsule-like hands and geometric scenery substantially limit likeness, anatomy and depth. Clean contours preserve basic integrity but do not establish sophisticated construction or finish.

MiniMax M3

A coherent illustrated portrait with developed facial shading, layered hair and purposeful costume detail. Replication remains limited by the frontal torso, separated hands, altered facial proportions and simplified landscape. Surface treatment and intact attachments deserve credit independently of the weaker likeness and anatomy.

Score breakdown

CategoryCrouton AlphaMiniMax M3
Task & likeness4.5/103.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.0/104.5/10
Space & placement4.5/103.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail4.0/106.0/10
Artistry & character4.5/105.0/10
Materials & effects4.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity6.0/106.0/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Same task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Crouton Alpha

A colorful, readable sunset beach scene with playful subjects and a clear central reflection. Purposeful equipment and animal details reward inspection, and the principal attachments remain intact. Basic geometric anatomy, mixed viewpoints and sparse directional shadows limit its construction and depth; smooth gradients provide atmosphere with little material differentiation.

MiniMax M3

A cheerful, coherent sunset illustration with framing palms, warm gradients and an aligned sun reflection. Animals and beach toys add character, but their construction remains basic. The sailboat appears suspended above the water horizon, while absent cast shadows weaken foreground contact. Clean geometric shapes provide polish without substantial texture or depth.

Score breakdown

CategoryCrouton AlphaMiniMax M3
Task & likeness8.5/108.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.0/104.5/10
Space & placement5.5/106.0/10
Light & reflections5.5/107.0/10
Purposeful detail7.0/106.0/10
Artistry & character5.0/105.0/10
Materials & effects5.5/105.0/10
Visual integrity7.0/105.5/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Crouton Alpha

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

MiniMax M3

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Same task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Crouton Alpha

A readable cartoon with expressive faces, purposeful markings and clear water motion. Hull shading and an underside shadow establish modest depth. The dog contacts the controls, but the raccoon's frontal pose leaves its seated weight unresolved. Simple anatomy and limited shared perspective constrain the drawing.

MiniMax M3

The raccoon sits above the dog's back, and the dog reaches toward the jet ski controls. Expressive faces and a vivid sunset make the scene appealing. Construction is simplified: the dog's paws and steering grip are ambiguous, the hull is shallow, and blurred wake patches give limited water displacement. Sunset glow exceeds the lighting modeled on the riders.

Score breakdown

CategoryCrouton AlphaMiniMax M3
Task & likeness7.0/108.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.0/105.5/10
Space & placement6.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections6.0/106.0/10
Purposeful detail6.5/107.0/10
Artistry & character5.0/106.0/10
Materials & effects5.5/106.0/10
Visual integrity6.0/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Same task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Crouton Alpha

A recognizable, expressive pelican cyclist with purposeful feather and bicycle detail. Readable steering reach, connected machinery and modest body shading earn additional credit. Jointless legs, uncertain pedal engagement and unclear seated support keep the central action only partially resolved; shallow space and simple materials further limit the illustration.

MiniMax M3

The pelican's long bill, pouch and curved neck read clearly, and the warm sunset gives the composition appeal. Bicycle construction weakens the riding action: feet do not convincingly engage the pedals, crank connections are unclear, and body support is unresolved. Clean silhouettes and orderly spokes provide a competent illustrative finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryCrouton AlphaMiniMax M3
Task & likeness7.0/108.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.0/105.5/10
Space & placement5.5/106.5/10
Light & reflections5.5/106.5/10
Purposeful detail6.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character5.5/106.5/10
Materials & effects5.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity6.0/106.5/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.