STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra Low

Claude Fable 5.1 leads GPT-6.1 Terra Low by 21.7 points on StealthMark, 63.0 to 41.3. It leads on 8 of 9 benchmarks, including Latch, and GPT-6.1 Terra Low on 1, including Foresight. Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

63.0/100Overall rank 7/55
41.3/100Overall rank 35/55

General Intelligence

60.6/100
34.3/100

Visual Intelligence

67.1/100
53.1/100

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Claude Fable 5.1
  • GPT-6.1 Terra Low
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

  • Claude Fable 5.1
  • GPT-6.1 Terra Low
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Claude Fable 5.1: $50$10 inputGPT-6.1 Terra Low: No list price
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Claude Fable 5.1: 1M128K max outputGPT-6.1 Terra Low: Not published
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Claude Fable 5.1: 122tokens/sGPT-6.1 Terra Low: Not measured
Developer
AnthropicNot published
Released
1 Sep 2026Not published
Origin
United StatesNot published
Input → output
Text, image → textNot published

Full datasheets, every price and sourceClaude Fable 5.1 ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Claude Fable 5.1 34.2/100Rank 40/512 of 3 levels

2 of 3 played
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 38 ptsTurn 17 / 20

GPT-6.1 Terra Low 36.1/100Rank 26/51

Survived 1 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 39 ptsTurn 20 / 20

Points per level

LevelClaude Fable 5.1GPT-6.1 Terra Low
Level 1Second Thoughts
21 ptsOut of lives
4 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
Pending
8 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
8 ptsOut of lives
9 ptsSurvived

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Claude Fable 5.1 82.6/100Rank 6/52

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

GPT-6.1 Terra Low 62.4/100Rank 23/52

Cleared 4 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Points per level

LevelClaude Fable 5.1GPT-6.1 Terra Low
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
9.8 ptsCleared
9.2 ptsCleared
Level 3Relay vault
19.2 ptsCleared
18.8 ptsCleared
Level 4Passing bay
18.2 ptsClearedFinished early · 3 beacons left
10.2 ptsFinished early
Level 5Second thoughts
20.6 ptsCleared
20.6 ptsCleared

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Claude Fable 5.1

The broad paint sequence, bilateral near-field sphere arrangement, overlaps and diminishing panel repetitions are recognizable; crimson is slightly too low. Small paint scale and basic shading provide material cues, although the steel response remains soft. Inaccurate light projections, missing outer chains and incomplete nested room imagery remain the principal limitations.

GPT-6.1 Terra Low

Deformed colored paint and a separate airborne black body establish readable interaction history. Cyan has travelled too far, framing differs substantially, and the mirror system supplies only elementary bands and oval copies. Missing recursive geometry, nested spherical imagery and emitter mapping remain the dominant weaknesses.

Score breakdown

CategoryClaude Fable 5.1GPT-6.1 Terra Low
State at 600 ms24.0/2522.0/25
Camera and placement14.0/154.0/15
Reflections48.0/12010.0/120
Materials and scale7.5/106.0/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Claude Fable 5.1

The coral palette, friendly face, matte shading and cream arch create a coherent emblem. However, the mantle is elongated rather than compact, and the appendages spread mostly sideways and downward instead of forming an evenly spaced, flower-like starburst. Two thin hanging appendages weaken the thick-arm motif. Clean contours and balanced framing support the simple design.

GPT-6.1 Terra Low

Six attached outward-facing heads, delicate scales and soft ivory shading establish an orderly decorative motif. Separate paddle-shaped bodies replace the required interlocking loops and leave no enclosed central hexagon. Surface detail provides interest, but repeated simple forms, schematic faces and limited anatomical modeling constrain the result.

Score breakdown

CategoryClaude Fable 5.1GPT-6.1 Terra Low
Task & likeness6.5/104.0/10
Anatomy & construction7.0/103.5/10
Space & placement7.5/104.5/10
Light & reflections6.5/105.5/10
Purposeful detail6.0/105.5/10
Artistry & character7.0/105.0/10
Materials & effects6.5/105.5/10
Visual integrity8.0/104.0/10

Benchmark task

Claude Fable 5.1

A coral squid with spreading arms tests connected anatomy, balanced composition and soft surface shading.

GPT-6.1 Terra Low

A pale serpent woven into an interlocking knot tests connected anatomy, repeated structure and readable overlaps. Organic surface detail must work with the overall geometry.

Mona Lisa

Same task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Claude Fable 5.1

The dark clothing, crossed hands and hazy landscape establish the Mona Lisa composition. Replication is limited by the frontal, elongated face, wide eyes and simplified smile. Rounded, parallel fingers and unclear wrist transitions weaken the hands. Warm facial shading gives some volume, but broad garment shapes and scattered crack marks substitute for convincing folds and painterly detail.

GPT-6.1 Terra Low

A recognizable, coherent portrait with purposeful facial detail, warm local volume and layered scenery. The frontal pose, enlarged face, merged hands and shallow clothing construction substantially limit replication and drawing skill. The visible successes support retaining the current assessment.

Score breakdown

CategoryClaude Fable 5.1GPT-6.1 Terra Low
Task & likeness5.5/105.0/10
Anatomy & construction6.0/104.5/10
Space & placement6.0/105.0/10
Light & reflections6.0/106.0/10
Purposeful detail5.0/105.0/10
Artistry & character5.5/105.5/10
Materials & effects6.0/105.0/10
Visual integrity6.5/106.0/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Same task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Claude Fable 5.1

The colorful sunset, layered shoreline, animals, kite and beach toys fulfill the lively beach brief. Clean silhouettes and a balanced composition give the illustration character. Construction is simplified: the umbrella resembles a segmented fan, dolphins have weak water interaction, and the sun’s reflection forms a rigid widening wedge. Flat surfaces and sparse contact shadows limit depth.

GPT-6.1 Terra Low

A coherent sunset scene demonstrates the beach, animals, birds and reflections. Flowing silhouettes, warm color transitions and intact attachments are its strongest properties. Simplified anatomy, the turtle's elevated viewing angle and symbolic surface effects constrain drawing complexity and physical depth.

Score breakdown

CategoryClaude Fable 5.1GPT-6.1 Terra Low
Task & likeness8.5/108.0/10
Anatomy & construction7.0/105.5/10
Space & placement7.0/105.5/10
Light & reflections7.0/106.5/10
Purposeful detail7.5/106.0/10
Artistry & character7.5/105.0/10
Materials & effects6.5/105.5/10
Visual integrity7.5/107.5/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Claude Fable 5.1

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

GPT-6.1 Terra Low

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Same task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Claude Fable 5.1

The raccoon rides on the dog's back, and the dog's extended foreleg reaches the jet ski controls. Expressive faces, a clear silhouette and sweeping spray make the action readable. Limb and handlebar overlaps weaken construction; broad shading provides limited volume, and the glowing sun has little corresponding reflection on the water. Clean vector shapes support an appealing but simplified illustration.

GPT-6.1 Terra Low

Recognizable animals, a coherent craft and sweeping wake make an appealing cartoon. Basic limb construction, weakly demonstrated raccoon seating and limited shared perspective constrain the scene. Small identifying details work well, while lighting and materials remain broadly graphic.

Score breakdown

CategoryClaude Fable 5.1GPT-6.1 Terra Low
Task & likeness8.5/106.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.5/105.0/10
Space & placement7.0/105.5/10
Light & reflections5.5/104.5/10
Purposeful detail7.0/106.0/10
Artistry & character7.0/105.0/10
Materials & effects6.5/105.0/10
Visual integrity7.5/106.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Same task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Claude Fable 5.1

The pelican reads clearly, with an expressive face, prominent bill and appealing composition. Both legs connect to the body, but the far foot's pedal contact and the wing's steering grip remain unclear. Wheel alignment and background layers are coherent. Clean contours and feather lines give polish, while schematic machinery, limited surface texture and weak directional lighting constrain the finish.

GPT-6.1 Terra Low

A coherent coastal illustration with a distinctive pelican, controlled contours and clearly organised bicycle wheels. Visible saddle support and shaped neck and wing contours earn credit beyond basic geometric construction. Rubbery legs, unresolved pedal contacts and absent steering contact limit the riding action. Lighting and materials remain restrained and spatially shallow.

Score breakdown

CategoryClaude Fable 5.1GPT-6.1 Terra Low
Task & likeness8.5/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction7.0/105.5/10
Space & placement7.5/106.0/10
Light & reflections6.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail7.0/106.5/10
Artistry & character7.0/106.0/10
Materials & effects6.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity8.0/106.0/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.