STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 scores 10.2 points higher overall (56.4 vs 46.2). Qwen3.8 Max 0902 scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

46.2/100
56.4/100

General Intelligence

24.6/100
41.6/100

Visual Intelligence

62.2/100
67.4/100

Newton's Mirror

Same prompt

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

Muse Spark 1.316.9/100

Muse Spark 1.3: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The paint state is incorrectly and poorly drawn, despite a recognizable sphere-and-paint setup. The oversized sphere, oversized compact paint bodies, and blurred wall and floor images further limit the result. Isolated reflection cues provide very little support for the required repeated virtual rooms, nested spherical imagery or emitter mapping.

Simplified prompt

A shiny steel ball spins in a room with mirrored walls and a mirrored floor. Red, cyan and black paint float above it. Gravity suddenly switches on. Draw the scene a moment later, as the ball drops and paint begins landing on its spinning surface. Show the reflections repeating through the room.

The exact prompt is held back to prevent benchmaxxing.

Qwen3.8 Max 090235.8/100

Qwen3.8 Max 0902: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The central sphere and differentiated cyan/crimson interaction are supported. The tiny highlighted object above the sphere provides partial airborne-black evidence. The few isolated sphere and panel images preserve limited optical relationships, but most of the repeating mirror-room structure is missing. Core score: 64.5/170; including the floor-damage reward: 64.5/180.

Simplified prompt

A shiny steel ball spins in a room with mirrored walls and a mirrored floor. Red, cyan and black paint float above it. Gravity suddenly switches on. Draw the scene a moment later, as the ball drops and paint begins landing on its spinning surface. Show the reflections repeating through the room.

The exact prompt is held back to prevent benchmaxxing.

Compare category scores
CategoryMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902
State at 600 ms12.5/2523.5/25
Camera and placement8.5/1511.0/15
Reflections5.5/12024.0/120
Materials and scale4.0/106.0/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Selfie

Different prompts

Muse Spark 1.375.3/100

Muse Spark 1.3: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The luminous creature and geometric mirror counterpart communicate self-recognition through a coherent palette and expressive eyes. The transformed reflection is purposeful. Simple oval anatomy, ambiguous reaching-arm construction, shallow spatial staging and limited illumination of nearby surfaces keep the illustration below exceptional execution.

Simplified prompt

Imagine yourself as an AI creature looking at its reflection. Choose a creature and setting that express how you see yourself. The reflection can match you or show a different side of your identity.

The exact prompt is held back to prevent benchmaxxing.

Qwen3.8 Max 090274.3/100

Qwen3.8 Max 0902: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent ornamental illustration with balanced framing, appealing color and legible magical accessories. The disconnected raised wrist, incorrect raised-arm side and palm orientation, bear-like facial proportions and shallow material modeling limit execution. Clean decoration and compact spatial balance remain strengths.

Simplified prompt

Draw a friendly capybara floating in ornate green and white robes. A glowing halo and small floating orbs surround it, giving it the feel of a gentle fantasy guide.

The exact prompt is held back to prevent benchmaxxing.

Compare category scores
CategoryMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Prompt & likeness8.5/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction7.0/106.5/10
Space & placement7.0/108.0/10
Light & reflections7.0/107.0/10
Purposeful detail7.5/108.0/10
Artistry & character8.0/107.5/10
Materials & effects7.0/107.5/10
Visual integrity8.0/108.0/10

Beach

Same prompt

Muse Spark 1.365.5/100

Muse Spark 1.3: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The warm sunset, framing palms and colorful beach accessories create an appealing scene with the requested animals, birds and reflections. Construction remains schematic: the raised hand misses the kite string, and a doglike silhouette hangs above the water without clear support. The sun reflection establishes a focal path, but shadows and materials lack depth. An unexplained horizontal bar crosses the sun.

Exact prompt

Create an SVG of a amazing beach scene. Sunset, animals, fun, birds, reflections Make it a masterpiece, no tools allowed

Qwen3.8 Max 090276.8/100

Qwen3.8 Max 0902: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A strong stylized beach illustration with coherent sunset color, lively dolphin arcs and balanced activity. Clean contours, readable ground contact and an aligned reflection support the finish. Schematic anatomy, sparse small-subject features, flat materials and repetitive water highlights limit physical depth and refinement.

Exact prompt

Create an SVG of a amazing beach scene. Sunset, animals, fun, birds, reflections Make it a masterpiece, no tools allowed

Compare category scores
CategoryMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Prompt & likeness8.0/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/107.0/10
Space & placement6.0/107.5/10
Light & reflections6.5/108.0/10
Purposeful detail6.5/107.0/10
Artistry & character7.0/108.0/10
Materials & effects6.0/106.5/10
Visual integrity7.0/108.5/10

Mona Lisa

Different prompts

Muse Spark 1.341.0/100

Muse Spark 1.3: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

Dark hair, a restrained smile and overlapping hands suggest Mona Lisa, but replication is weak. The face is markedly elongated, the hands are oval pads with faint finger strokes, and the atmospheric landscape is absent. Soft gradients provide basic volume, while the frontal symmetry, shallow space and sparse clothing detail limit the portrait’s drawing quality.

Exact prompt

Replicate mona-lisa as SVG Make it a masterpiece, no tools allowed

Qwen3.8 Max 090251.0/100

Qwen3.8 Max 0902: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A recognizable, cohesive Mona Lisa interpretation with readable landscape layers and a restrained expression. Continuous body construction and clean contours support readability, but broad hands, simplified drapery, frontal symmetry and limited facial volume keep the execution basic and uneven.

Exact prompt

Replicate mona-lisa as SVG Make it a masterpiece, no tools allowed

Compare category scores
CategoryMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Prompt & likeness4.0/106.0/10
Anatomy & construction3.5/104.5/10
Space & placement4.0/105.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/105.0/10
Purposeful detail3.5/104.0/10
Artistry & character4.0/105.0/10
Materials & effects4.0/104.5/10
Visual integrity5.5/106.0/10

Raccoon

Same prompt

Muse Spark 1.368.8/100

Muse Spark 1.3: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The raccoon clearly rides on the dog's back, and the dog's paws reach the jet ski controls. Expressive faces and bright colors make the scene appealing. Simplified joints, crowded steering geometry and shallow hull perspective limit construction. The sun has no corresponding water reflection, and the splash shapes convey speed more clearly than convincing displacement.

Exact prompt

Generate an SVG: A raccoon sits on a dog's back while the dog steers a jet ski Make it a masterpiece, no tools allowed

Qwen3.8 Max 090270.3/100

Qwen3.8 Max 0902: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The riding arrangement and steering action are readable, supported by coherent visible attachments and useful character details. Clean shapes, strong color separation and clustered foam make the scene appealing and active. Stiff anatomy, crowded controls, limited directional lighting and simple surface treatments constrain sophistication.

Exact prompt

Generate an SVG: A raccoon sits on a dog's back while the dog steers a jet ski Make it a masterpiece, no tools allowed

Compare category scores
CategoryMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Prompt & likeness8.5/108.0/10
Anatomy & construction6.5/107.0/10
Space & placement7.0/107.0/10
Light & reflections5.0/106.5/10
Purposeful detail6.5/107.0/10
Artistry & character7.0/106.5/10
Materials & effects6.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity7.5/107.5/10

Pelican

Benchmax control

Outside General and Visual Intelligence.

Muse Spark 1.372.0/100

Muse Spark 1.3: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The pelican and bicycle are immediately recognizable, with an expressive face, bold bill and cheerful composition. Both legs connect to the body and reach pedal-like supports, but articulation, saddle support and wing contact with the handlebar remain unclear. Wheel alignment and layering are coherent. Simple landscape shapes, generic shadows and limited material variation constrain the finish.

Exact prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle Make it a masterpiece, no tools allowed

Qwen3.8 Max 090271.5/100

Qwen3.8 Max 0902: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

An appealing graphic illustration with a recognizable pelican, readable bicycle and clean coastal composition. Steering contact and one connected pedal support the action. Ambiguous neck-to-torso construction, an unclear opposing pedal connection, shallow space and limited material and lighting effects constrain its execution.

Exact prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle Make it a masterpiece, no tools allowed

Compare category scores
CategoryMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Prompt & likeness9.0/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.5/106.5/10
Space & placement7.0/107.0/10
Light & reflections6.0/106.0/10
Purposeful detail7.0/107.0/10
Artistry & character7.5/107.5/10
Materials & effects6.5/106.0/10
Visual integrity7.5/108.0/10