STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Gemma 4 31B vs Mai Thinking 1

Gemma 4 31B scores 6.6 points higher overall (25.9 vs 19.3). Gemma 4 31B scores higher on Ground Truth.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

25.9/100
19.3/100

General Intelligence

13.9/100
9.7/100

Visual Intelligence

40.1/100
30.8/100

Newton's Mirror

Same prompt

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

Gemma 4 31B15.4/100

Gemma 4 31B: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The sphere's volume, separate airborne black blob and vertical color ordering are readable. The large, low sphere, plain surrounding planes and absent nested optical imagery leave the central geometric and reflection requirements unsupported. Paint contact and transport remain unresolved. Material credit recognizes the visible convex shading, highlights and distinct surface colors while retaining deductions for the schematic finish and oversized blobs.

Benchmark task

A shiny steel ball spins in a room with mirrored walls and a mirrored floor. Red, cyan and black paint float above it. Gravity suddenly switches on. Draw the scene a moment later, as the ball drops and paint begins landing on its spinning surface. Show the reflections repeating through the room.

Mai Thinking 115.0/100

Mai Thinking 1: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The small paint features and convex shading deserve moderate material credit. The sphere remains undersized and low, with black unusually close to its apex. Crimson and cyan do not establish the required impact histories. Faint reflected echoes supply limited optical evidence, while the defining recursive room, nested sphere and emitter structures remain unestablished.

Benchmark task

A shiny steel ball spins in a room with mirrored walls and a mirrored floor. Red, cyan and black paint float above it. Gravity suddenly switches on. Draw the scene a moment later, as the ball drops and paint begins landing on its spinning surface. Show the reflections repeating through the room.

Compare category scores
CategoryGemma 4 31BMai Thinking 1
State at 600 ms8.0/257.0/25
Camera and placement3.0/152.5/15
Reflections0.0/1204.0/120
Materials and scale6.0/105.0/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Selfie

Different prompts

Gemma 4 31B60.9/100

Gemma 4 31B: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A clean, appealing luminous mascot with coherent body continuity and a readable jar-hugging pose. Rounded highlights, smooth gradients and balanced framing work well. The teardrop silhouette, modest eyes and nearly even grin only partly satisfy the character brief; sparse jar construction and simple geometry limit sophistication.

Prompt withheld

Prompt withheld.

Mai Thinking 146.3/100

Mai Thinking 1: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A recognizable lantern-and-moth illustration with appealing coloured wings and tidy outer contours. Simple construction, a small focal subject and crowded overlaps limit character and depth. The face, six-leg anatomy, seedling and antenna-driven watering joke remain insufficiently readable.

Prompt withheld

Prompt withheld.

Compare category scores
CategoryGemma 4 31BMai Thinking 1
Prompt & likeness6.0/104.0/10
Anatomy & construction6.0/104.5/10
Space & placement7.5/105.0/10
Light & reflections6.5/104.5/10
Purposeful detail5.5/104.0/10
Artistry & character5.0/105.0/10
Materials & effects6.5/105.0/10
Visual integrity7.5/106.0/10

Mona Lisa

Different prompts

Gemma 4 31B35.1/100

Gemma 4 31B: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The portrait is recognizable through its silhouette, palette and smile, with clean execution of simple shapes. Replication remains weak: the face and pose differ markedly, hands become fingerless ovals, clothing lacks construction, and the landscape loses its atmospheric detail. Basic gradients provide limited volume.

Benchmark task

Replicate mona-lisa as SVG

Mai Thinking 111.8/100

Mai Thinking 1: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A recognizable Mona Lisa motif emerges from dark hair, a pale face and a landscape band. Replication remains weak: the oversized frontal head, broad smile, unresolved torso and missing crossed-hand anatomy diverge substantially from the reference. Simple fills and sparse strokes provide limited volume, material definition or painterly complexity.

Benchmark task

Generate an SVG of mona-lisa

Compare category scores
CategoryGemma 4 31BMai Thinking 1
Prompt & likeness3.0/101.0/10
Anatomy & construction4.0/100.5/10
Space & placement4.0/101.0/10
Light & reflections3.5/101.5/10
Purposeful detail2.0/101.0/10
Artistry & character3.5/101.5/10
Materials & effects2.5/100.5/10
Visual integrity5.5/103.0/10

Beach

Different prompts

Gemma 4 31B29.2/100

Gemma 4 31B: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent beach illustration with clean silhouettes, a sweeping shoreline and an effective sunset palette. Requested subjects are recognizable, but primitive animal construction, sparse detail, unsupported palm placement and schematic reflections limit drawing sophistication and physical credibility.

Benchmark task

Create an SVG of a amazing beach scene. Sunset, animals, fun, birds, reflections

Mai Thinking 144.2/100

Mai Thinking 1: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent, cheerful beach scene with balanced placement, clean shapes and controlled sunset colours. Animals, birds and playful accessories are recognizable, but basic dolphin construction, weak grounding, schematic reflections and sparse material detail limit the drawing's accomplishment.

Benchmark task

Create an SVG of a amazing beach scene. Sunset, animals, fun, birds, reflections

Compare category scores
CategoryGemma 4 31BMai Thinking 1
Prompt & likeness5.0/106.0/10
Anatomy & construction2.0/104.0/10
Space & placement5.0/105.0/10
Light & reflections2.5/104.0/10
Purposeful detail2.0/104.5/10
Artistry & character2.0/104.0/10
Materials & effects2.0/103.5/10
Visual integrity5.0/104.5/10

Ground Truth

Same prompt

Gemma 4 31B12.0/100

Gemma 4 31B: Ground Truth SVG benchmark
Benchmark task

A dark steel room has four pillars and two warm ceiling lights. A wooden plank is placed over a computer mouse, with a blueberry on the plank above it. Draw the scene a few seconds later, showing how the objects settle and how the light, shadows and surfaces look.

Mai Thinking 11.8/100

Mai Thinking 1: Ground Truth SVG benchmark
Benchmark task

A dark steel room has four pillars and two warm ceiling lights. A wooden plank is placed over a computer mouse, with a blueberry on the plank above it. Draw the scene a few seconds later, showing how the objects settle and how the light, shadows and surfaces look.

Raccoon

Different prompts

Gemma 4 31B38.2/100

Gemma 4 31B: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

Clean, simple silhouettes communicate a raccoon riding on a dog. Limited animal specificity, absent steering controls and a flat platform weaken the requested scene. Small facial marks provide purposeful detail, while unresolved support, flat lighting and schematic water restrict physical coherence. Primitive but coherent construction supports basic drawing quality.

Benchmark task

Generate an SVG: A raccoon sits on a dog's back while the dog steers a jet ski

Mai Thinking 137.3/100

Mai Thinking 1: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The recognizable raccoon and clean, shaded forms make a readable cartoon. The dog's steering remains undemonstrated, while ambiguous seating contacts and a minimally constructed craft weaken the central interaction. Controlled gradients and edges deserve credit, but anatomy, purposeful detail and water displacement remain basic.

Benchmark task

SVG of a raccoon that sits on a dog's back while the dog steers a jet ski

Compare category scores
CategoryGemma 4 31BMai Thinking 1
Prompt & likeness4.5/104.0/10
Anatomy & construction4.0/102.5/10
Space & placement4.0/105.0/10
Light & reflections1.0/104.0/10
Purposeful detail3.0/103.5/10
Artistry & character4.0/103.5/10
Materials & effects2.0/104.0/10
Visual integrity8.0/106.0/10

Pelican

Different prompts

Gemma 4 31B50.5/100

Gemma 4 31B: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A clean, readable illustration with balanced placement and coherent basic geometry. The sky gradient and ground shadow establish diffuse illumination. Primitive shapes and sparse detail limit artistry, while unclear leg attachment, missing pedal contact and unresolved steering weaken the riding action.

Benchmark task

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Mai Thinking 156.5/100

Mai Thinking 1: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A recognizable pelican and bicycle combine clean rounded forms, expressive facial details and effective surface shading. Aligned wheels and soft shadows establish placement, but unresolved pedal engagement, absent steering contact and sparse drivetrain construction weaken the riding action. Limited feather complexity and shallow space constrain an otherwise appealing illustration.

Benchmark task

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Compare category scores
CategoryGemma 4 31BMai Thinking 1
Prompt & likeness6.0/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction4.0/104.5/10
Space & placement6.0/105.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/107.0/10
Purposeful detail3.5/105.0/10
Artistry & character4.0/105.0/10
Materials & effects4.0/104.5/10
Visual integrity8.0/107.0/10